163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8938331)
1. SPIRS, WinSPIRS, and OVID: a comparison of three MEDLINE-on-CD-ROM interfaces.
Schoonbaert D
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Jan; 84(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 8938331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SPIRS, WinSPIRS, and OVID: a question of free-text versus thesaurus retrieval?
Fremer E; Larsson B
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1997 Jan; 85(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 9028574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Language barriers and bibliographic retrieval effectiveness: use of MEDLINE by French-speaking end users.
Mouillet E
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1999 Oct; 87(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 10550030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PubMed, Internet Grateful Med, and Ovid: a comparison of three MEDLINE Internet interfaces.
De Groote SL
Med Ref Serv Q; 2000; 19(4):1-13. PubMed ID: 11299673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Foreign international bibliographic databases. Index Medicus: presentation and use (CD-ROM edition)].
Bloch-Mouillet E
Sante; 1997; 7(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9273120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MEDLINE and MeSH: challenges for end users.
Delozier EP; Lingle VA
Med Ref Serv Q; 1992; 11(3):29-46. PubMed ID: 10122123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of MEDLINE CD-ROM and librarian-mediated search service users.
Seago BL; Campbell FM
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1993 Jan; 81(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8428194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of CD-Rom and Internet access to clinical information.
Fountain JS; Reith DM; Watts M
Int J Med Inform; 2005 Sep; 74(9):769-77. PubMed ID: 15996516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating CD-ROM versions of the MEDLINE database: a checklist.
Hewison NS
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1989 Oct; 77(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 2676046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ranking the whole MEDLINE database according to a large training set using text indexing.
Suomela BP; Andrade MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():75. PubMed ID: 15790421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Teaching end users the CD Plus MEDLINE menu mode in thirty minutes.
Tomaiuolo NG
Med Ref Serv Q; 1991; 10(4):67-79. PubMed ID: 10117785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EMBL-search: a CD-ROM based database query system.
Fuchs R; Stoehr P
Comput Appl Biosci; 1993 Feb; 9(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 8435771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Text similarity: an alternative way to search MEDLINE.
Lewis J; Ossowski S; Hicks J; Errami M; Garner HR
Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2298-304. PubMed ID: 16926219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple usage of the CD PLUS/UNIX system: performance in practice.
Volkers AC; Tjiam IA; van Laar A; Bleeker A
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1995 Oct; 83(4):436-9. PubMed ID: 8547902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internet Medline providers.
Vine DL; Coady TR
J Med Pract Manage; 1998; 14(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 10662266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [CD-ROM for radiologic literature research].
Knopp MV
Radiologe; 1994 Sep; 34(9):557-60. PubMed ID: 7800806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Literature databases for radiologists.
Raymond HW
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1992 Apr; 13(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 1599730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protein annotation by EBIMed.
Rebholz-Schuhmann D; Kirsch H; Arregui M; Gaudan S; Rynbeek M; Stoehr P
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 24(8):902-3. PubMed ID: 16900125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE.
Fishman DL; Stone VL; DiPaula BA
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Jul; 84(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 8883989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the OvidSP platform.
FitzSimmons M; Gross VA
Med Ref Serv Q; 2008; 27(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 19042719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
