261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8941183)
1. Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws.
Shetty V; Freymiller E; McBrearty D; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Nov; 54(11):1317-24; discussion 1324-6. PubMed ID: 8941183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies: effects of positional screw size and placement configuration.
Shetty V; Freymiller E; McBrearty D; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 May; 54(5):601-9: discussion 609-10. PubMed ID: 8632245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Altuncu F; Kazan D; Özden B
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Nov; 28(6):e553-e561. PubMed ID: 37823299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.
Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles.
Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
Oh JS; Kim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Kuik K; Ho JPTF; de Ruiter MHT; Klop C; Kleverlaan CJ; de Lange J; Hoekema A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 59(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 33468331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Murphy MT; Haug RH; Barber JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 May; 55(5):489-94; discussion 494-5. PubMed ID: 9146519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles.
Uckan S; Schwimmer A; Kummer F; Greenberg AM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11437421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stabilization of the short sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro testing of different plate and screw configurations.
Hammer B; Ettlin D; Rahn B; Prein J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Oct; 23(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 8530709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
