These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8941269)

  • 1. On the selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action potentials: is the rise time criterion too restrictive?
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1996 Dec; 19(12):1554-60. PubMed ID: 8941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rise time or rise rate: which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?
    Masakado Y; Akaboshi K; Kimura A; Chino N
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 40(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 11039123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Principal component analysis of the features of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1989 Apr; 12(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 2770781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV; Andreassen S
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis.
    Howard JE; McGill KC; Dorfman LJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 3185599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of standard and pediatric size concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 118(5):1162-5. PubMed ID: 17382584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer simulation study of the shape of motor unit action potential.
    Piotrkiewicz M
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1988; 39(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 3421135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of close proximity concentric and modified single fiber electromyographic recordings from extensor digitorum communis.
    Harmon RL; Rodriquez AA; Harmon PA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 33(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 8436087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part II: Activity, upper centile amplitude, and number of small segments.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Muscle Nerve; 1986; 9(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 3736582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antigravity posture for analysis of motor unit recruitment: the "45 degree test".
    Petajan JH
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Apr; 13(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 2355948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recording characteristics of monopolar EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2000101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skill and selection bias has least influence on motor unit action potential firing rate/frequency.
    Chu J; Takehara I; Li TC; Schwartz I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 43(7):387-92. PubMed ID: 14626717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of intramuscular needle position on motor unit action potential metrics.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Apr; 35(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 17221877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of motor unit firing rates by standard concentric needle electromyography.
    Gunreben G; Schulte-Mattler W
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Mar; 32(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 1313354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part I: Turns and amplitude measurements.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Muscle Nerve; 1986 Jun; 9(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 3724788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concentric macro electromyography.
    Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Sep; 14(9):820-5. PubMed ID: 1922175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of motor unit action potential energy.
    Sheean GL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 123(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 21903464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor unit tracking with high-density surface EMG.
    Maathuis EM; Drenthen J; van Dijk JP; Visser GH; Blok JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Dec; 18(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 18996724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation of myopathic motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1989 Mar; 12(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 2725550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.