These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8941732)

  • 1. Post and core retention with different cements.
    Leary JM; Holmes DC; Johnson WT
    Gen Dent; 1995; 43(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 8941732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of paraposts cemented with dentin-bonded resin cements.
    El-Mowafy OM; Milenkovic M
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):176-82. PubMed ID: 8700757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The effect of different fabrication methods and luting cements on post retention].
    Ma HM; Li ZC; Li H; Chen X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 22(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 15190802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Salama M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 9051596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of two axial wall height preparations on the retentive properties of full crowns using three different cements.
    Martins-Pinto MG; Pisani-Proenca J; Erhardt MC; Spielmann C; Del Castillo-Salmeron R; Lopes LA
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(6):569-73; quiz 574-5, 591-2. PubMed ID: 18810919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of effect of polymerizable and non-polymerizable desensitizing agents on crown-retentive-strength of zinc-phosphate, glass-ionomer and compomer cements.
    Patil PG; Parkhedkar RD; Patil SP; Bhowmik HS
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Sep; 20(3):102-10. PubMed ID: 23101176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements.
    Sen D; Poyrazoglu E; Tuncelli B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 15189317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading.
    Ertugrul HZ; Ismail YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 15867754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement.
    Cobb DS; Reinhardt JW; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 9545891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.