These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8941813)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct-placement gallium restorative alloy: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10323158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 9545902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 3-year longitudinal, controlled clinical study of a gallium-based restorative material.
    Dunne SM; Abraham R; Pankhurst CL
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):355-9; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 15789103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars.
    Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Guo IY; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 9590909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents.
    van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical properties and clinical performance of a gallium restorative material.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):241-5. PubMed ID: 8710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gallium restorative materials.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 64(9):645-7. PubMed ID: 9812433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study.
    Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams.
    Mair LH
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.