These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8941827)

  • 1. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements.
    Chu CH; King NM; Lee AM; Yiu CK; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jul; 27(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 8941827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of Class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Holan G; Simon H; Lewinstein I
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1437689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Olsen BT; Garcia-Godoy F; Marshall TD; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 2513842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Ketac-Silver restorations in primary molars.
    Holst A
    Swed Dent J; 1996; 20(6):209-14. PubMed ID: 9065982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R; Voss A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of finishing techniques on marginal adaption and surface morphology of three glass ionomer cements.
    Naguib EA; Carlson TJ
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1992; 71(6):20-2. PubMed ID: 1341697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II glass ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Stratmann RG; Berg JH; Donly KJ
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Jan; 20(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2503851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Sep; 10(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 11641841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cermet cements for milk tooth fillings. Preliminary results].
    Hickel R; Petschelt A; Voss A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):444-5. PubMed ID: 2517110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
    Prabhu NT; Munshi AK; Shetty TR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.