These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions. Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Neo J; Chew CL; Yap A; Sidhu S Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 9002808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results. Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10332375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations. Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up. Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements as Class III restorations. Osborne JW; Berry TG Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 2150170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]