These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8941830)

  • 21. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Hörsted-Bindslev P; Knudsen J; Baelum V
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9002810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials.
    Bouschlicher MR; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 9002867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.
    Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; De Stefano Dorigo E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The etiology and treatment of cervical erosion.
    Brackett WW
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1994 Jul; 74(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years.
    Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):438-41. PubMed ID: 12216560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct tooth-colored materials for noncarious lesions: a 3-year clinical report.
    Neo J; Chew CL
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 9063232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How finishing affects glass ionomers. Results of a five-year evaluation.
    Matis BA; Carlson T; Cochran M; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Jul; 122(7):43-6. PubMed ID: 1861011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of delayed polishing on gap formation of cervical restorations.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11817470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Sidhu SK; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15081549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restoration of cervical lesions: an update.
    McLellan M
    Hawaii Dent J; 1993 Apr; 24(4):10, 14. PubMed ID: 11816195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.