These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8941845)

  • 1. Effectiveness of the current enamel-dentinal adhesives: a new methodology for its evaluation.
    Pagliarini A; Rubini R; Rea M; Campese C; Grandini R
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Apr; 27(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 8941845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of five dentinal adhesives.
    Holtan JR; Nystrom GP; Rensch SE; Phelps RA; Douglas WH
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):189-93. PubMed ID: 8700759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel.
    Jain P; Stewart GP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11203791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assessment of marginal sealing using 7 dentin adhesive systems.
    Zivković S
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 11203961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro microleakage of dentin adhesives.
    Sorensen JA; Dixit NV; White SN; Avera SP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 1725698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The micromorphologic relationship between resin and dentin in Class V restorations: an in vivo and in vitro investigation.
    Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Sep; 25(9):621-5. PubMed ID: 7568715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro shear bond strength of two resin composites to dentin with five different dentin adhesives.
    Leirskar J; Oilo G; Nordbø H
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Dec; 29(12):787-92. PubMed ID: 10196856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micromorphologic relationship between resin and dentin in Class II restorations: an in vivo and in vitro investigation by scanning electron microscopy.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Dec; 25(12):861-6. PubMed ID: 7568696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
    Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
    SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations.
    de Almeida JB; Platt JA; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cochran MA; Eckert GJ
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 12877432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
    Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.