These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8942096)

  • 1. Assessment of an automated cephalometric analysis system.
    Forsyth DB; Davis DN
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Oct; 18(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 8942096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric analysis comparing five different methods.
    Oliver RG
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Nov; 18(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 1782186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks by a designed software.
    Shahidi Sh; Oshagh M; Gozin F; Salehi P; Danaei SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):20110187. PubMed ID: 23236215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of a commercially available digitizer: a new method for assessment of errors in linearity.
    Tourne LP
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 8974179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. At what resolution should I scan cephalometric radiographs?
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):118-9. PubMed ID: 14718889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system: Part I.
    Lowey MN
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 20(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 8399053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing digital and conventional cephalometric radiographs.
    Cohen JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 16102396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of filter sets for supervised pixel classification of cephalometric landmarks by spatial spectroscopy.
    Rudolph DJ; Coggins JM; Moon H
    Int J Med Inform; 1997 Dec; 47(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 9513007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
    Naoumova J; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance.
    Rakhshan V; Rakhshan H; Sheibaninia A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 20108870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system.
    Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study of automatic cephalometric analysis by digital image processing].
    Maizumi I
    Shigaku; 1989 Oct; 77(3):822-38. PubMed ID: 2489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.
    Mosleh MA; Baba MS; Malek S; Almaktari RA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):499. PubMed ID: 28155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The application and accuracy of feature matching on automated cephalometric superimposition.
    Jiang Y; Song G; Yu X; Dou Y; Li Q; Liu S; Han B; Xu T
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 32192440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.