These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8942096)

  • 21. Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Rudolph DJ; Sinclair PM; Coggins JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Feb; 113(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 9484208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
    Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
    Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
    Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL; Silveira HE
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric image analysis and measurement for orthognathic surgery.
    Yang J; Ling X; Lu Y; Wei M; Ding G
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2001 May; 39(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 11465880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved lateral cephalometric superimposition using an automated image fitting technique.
    Larson BE; Sievers MM; Ko CC
    Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):474-9. PubMed ID: 20050739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of facial features with a range camera.
    Strömland K; Chen Y; Michael G; Svensson E; Gustavsson T
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1998 Mar; 32(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9556823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Software system for calibrating examiners in cephalometric point identification.
    Silveira HL; Silveira HE; Dalla-Bona RR; Abdala DD; Bertoldi RF; von Wangenheim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 19268840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automatic landmarking of cephalograms using active appearance models.
    Vucinić P; Trpovski Z; Sćepan I
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 20203126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital image processing in cephalometric analysis.
    Jäger A; Döler W; Schormann T
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2913641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks.
    Lee JH; Yu HJ; Kim MJ; Kim JW; Choi J
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):270. PubMed ID: 33028287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Superimposition of serial cephalometric images directly on a computer monitor.
    Tsau JN; Carlson SK; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Penn Dent J (Phila); 2002; 102():11. PubMed ID: 15487553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.
    Prawat JS; Nieberg L; Cisneros GJ; Acs G
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 7486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Development of a computerized automatic identification system for use in cephalometry].
    Li S; Wu Q; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):466-8. PubMed ID: 12641966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Liu JK; Chen YT; Cheng KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.
    Huja SS; Grubaugh EL; Rummel AM; Fields HW; Beck FM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 19413396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: a preliminary report.
    Jackson PH; Dickson GC; Birnie DJ
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):122-32. PubMed ID: 3860252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.