These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8942826)
1. Concurrent hysterectomy at bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: benefits, risks, and costs. Grover CM; Kuppermann M; Kahn JG; Washington AE Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 8942826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy--implications for gynecologic practice in the United Kingdom. Raju KS; Auld BJ J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Feb; 1(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9050471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Raju KS; Auld BJ Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Dec; 101(12):1068-71. PubMed ID: 7826960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer risk after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign indications. Chow S; Raine-Bennett T; Samant ND; Postlethwaite DA; Holzapfel M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):900.e1-900.e7. PubMed ID: 32585221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998-2011. Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Mogos MF; Hart S; Salihu HM; Imudia AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):713.e1-13. PubMed ID: 25935772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practice variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign abdominal hysterectomy: a population-based study. Cusimano MC; Moineddin R; Chiu M; Ferguson SE; Aktar S; Liu N; Baxter NN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):585.e1-585.e30. PubMed ID: 33359174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mortality reduction and cost-effectiveness of performing hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for prophylaxis against serous/serous-like uterine cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Havrilesky LJ; Moss HA; Chino J; Myers ER; Kauff ND Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jun; 145(3):549-554. PubMed ID: 28390820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy: a decision analysis. Cadish LA; Shepherd JP; Barber EL; Ridgeway B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):603.e1-603.e6. PubMed ID: 28619689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among Taiwanese women undergoing benign hysterectomy: a population-based, pooled, cross-sectional study. Lai JC; Huang N; Wang KL; Hu HY; Chen IT; Chou YJ Menopause; 2015 Jul; 22(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 25387346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic findings, histopathologic evaluation, and clinical outcomes in women with chronic pelvic pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Behera M; Vilos GA; Hollett-Caines J; Abu-Rafea B; Ahmad R J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 16962527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elective hysterectomy. Benefits, risks, and costs. Sandberg SI; Barnes BA; Weinstein MC; Braun P Med Care; 1985 Sep; 23(9):1067-85. PubMed ID: 3928987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-hospital complications of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Lai JC; Chen HH; Chu KH; Wang KL; Huang N; Hu HY; Chou YJ Menopause; 2017 Feb; 24(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 27779566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes of Israeli gynecologists towards risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomy at hysterectomy for benign conditions and the use of hormonal therapy. Assaf W; Andraous M; Lavie O; Segev Y Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():48-54. PubMed ID: 35279641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent risk-reduction surgery in patients with increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Elmi M; Azin A; Elnahas A; McCready DR; Cil TD Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 171(1):217-223. PubMed ID: 29761322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Revised Markov Model Evaluating Oophorectomy at the Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication: Age 65 Years Revisited. Rush SK; Ma X; Newton MA; Rose SL Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 139(5):735-744. PubMed ID: 35576331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oophorectomy in premenopausal women: health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. Teplin V; Vittinghoff E; Lin F; Learman LA; Richter HE; Kuppermann M Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):347-54. PubMed ID: 17267835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study. Falconer H; Yin L; Grönberg H; Altman D J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Feb; 107(2):. PubMed ID: 25628372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Variations by History of Military Service and Birth Cohort. Callegari LS; Gray KE; Zephyrin LC; Harrington LB; Gerber MR; Cochrane BB; Weitlauf JC; Bean-Mayberry B; Bastian LA; Mattocks KM; Haskell SG; Katon JG Gerontologist; 2016 Feb; 56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S67-77. PubMed ID: 26768393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]