104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8944163)
41. Consequences of stabilising selection for polygenic variation.
Mather K
Heredity (Edinb); 1987 Apr; 58 ( Pt 2)():267-77. PubMed ID: 3570838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dominance--one hundred and fifteen years after Mendel's paper.
Porteous JW
J Theor Biol; 1996 Oct; 182(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 8944153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The genotype-phenotype relationship and evolutionary genetics in the light of the Metabolic Control Analysis.
de Vienne D; Coton C; Dillmann C
Biosystems; 2023 Oct; 232():105000. PubMed ID: 37586656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dominance reversals and the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness.
Connallon T; Chenoweth SF
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000118. PubMed ID: 30695026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The distribution of allelic effects under mutation and selection.
Frank SA; Slatkin M
Genet Res; 1990 Apr; 55(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 2370007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Fluxes and metabolic pools as model traits for quantitative genetics. I. The L-shaped distribution of gene effects.
Bost B; Dillmann C; de Vienne D
Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):2001-12. PubMed ID: 10581302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Allozymes and fitness: Evolution of a problem.
Eanes WF
Trends Ecol Evol; 1987 Feb; 2(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 21227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mutation-selection balance and metabolic control theory.
Clark AG
Genetics; 1991 Nov; 129(3):909-23. PubMed ID: 1752427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Allelic isozymes and the mechanistic study of evolution.
Watt WB
Isozymes Curr Top Biol Med Res; 1985; 12():89-132. PubMed ID: 3886597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The molecular basis of dominance.
Kacser H; Burns JA
Genetics; 1981; 97(3-4):639-66. PubMed ID: 7297851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The population genetics of alleles affecting enzyme activity.
Hastings IM
J Theor Biol; 1992 Aug; 157(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 1465018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dominance is not inevitable.
Cornish-Bowden A
J Theor Biol; 1987 Apr; 125(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 3657214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A rational treatment of Mendelian genetics.
Porteous JW
Theor Biol Med Model; 2004 Aug; 1():6. PubMed ID: 15339331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer.
Szathmáry E
Genetics; 1993 Jan; 133(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8417983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. UNPREDICTABILITY OF CORRELATED RESPONSE TO SELECTION: LINKAGE AND INITIAL FREQUENCY ALSO MATTER.
Lascoux M
Evolution; 1997 Oct; 51(5):1394-1400. PubMed ID: 28568629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Dominance vs epistasis: the biophysical origins and plasticity of genetic interactions within and between alleles.
Xie X; Sun X; Wang Y; Lehner B; Li X
Nat Commun; 2023 Sep; 14(1):5551. PubMed ID: 37689712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Estimating directional epistasis.
Le Rouzic A
Front Genet; 2014; 5():198. PubMed ID: 25071828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dosage, deletions and dominance: simple models of the evolution of gene expression.
Hurst LD; Randerson JP
J Theor Biol; 2000 Aug; 205(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 10931758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dominance, pleiotropy and metabolic structure.
Keightley PD; Kacser H
Genetics; 1987 Oct; 117(2):319-29. PubMed ID: 3666444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of selection methods for improvement of the population hybrid.
St Martin SK
Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Aug; 72(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 24248081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
