These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8944198)

  • 1. Interocular differences in visual function in normal subjects.
    Wood JM; Bullimore MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Nov; 16(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 8944198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low contrast letter acuity in age-related maculopathy.
    Abadi RV; Pantazidou M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Nov; 16(6):455-9. PubMed ID: 8944191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different forms of monocular occlusion on measures of central visual function.
    Wildsoet C; Wood J; Maag H; Sabdia S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 9829113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation of visual function to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.
    Fisher JB; Jacobs DA; Markowitz CE; Galetta SL; Volpe NJ; Nano-Schiavi ML; Baier ML; Frohman EM; Winslow H; Frohman TC; Calabresi PA; Maguire MG; Cutter GR; Balcer LJ
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 16406539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project.
    Rubin GS; West SK; Muñoz B; Bandeen-Roche K; Zeger S; Schein O; Fried LP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Mar; 38(3):557-68. PubMed ID: 9071208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetric papilledema in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prospective interocular comparison of sensory visual function.
    Wall M; White WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 39(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 9430554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of differences between eyes on binocular measures of vision in patients with cataracts.
    Comas M; Castells X; Acosta ER; Tuñí J
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun; 21(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 16518364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normative contrast sensitivity values for the back-lit Melbourne Edge Test and the effect of visual impairment.
    Eperjesi F; Wolffsohn J; Bowden J; Napper G; Rubinstein M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 15491489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Early clinical evaluation of visual function in patients with age-related cataract].
    Fu J; Wang J; Wang NL; Kang HJ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 42(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 16643756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts.
    Virgili G; Pierrottet C; Parmeggiani F; Pennino M; Giacomelli G; Steindler P; Menchini U; Orzalesi N;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3418-24. PubMed ID: 15452044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microdot test of foveal function. A comparison with visual acuity at high and low contrast.
    Malmer L; Martin L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Mar; 25(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 15713199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in the lower displacement limit for motion with age.
    Wood JM; Bullimore MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7724216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 1454362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance.
    Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Brabyn J; Schneck ME; Jampolsky A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 38(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 9008645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The influence of IOL implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and colour vision 2 and 4 months after cataract surgery].
    Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 Apr; 62(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16640052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interocular differences of the visual field in normal subjects.
    Brenton RS; Phelps CD; Rojas P; Woolson RF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 May; 27(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 3700029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters?
    Pesudovs K; Marsack JD; Donnelly WJ; Thibos LN; Applegate RA
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):S508-14. PubMed ID: 15523967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.