These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8944198)

  • 21. Associations of visual function with physical outcomes and limitations 5 years later in an older population: the Beaver Dam eye study.
    Klein BE; Moss SE; Klein R; Lee KE; Cruickshanks KJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):644-50. PubMed ID: 12689880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart.
    Elliott DB; Sanderson K; Conkey A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2330208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Melbourne Edge Test contrast sensitivity measures in the visually impaired.
    Wolffsohn JS; Eperjesi F; Napper G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 15953123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproducibility of visual acuity assessment in normal and low visual acuity.
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Criteria for monocular acuity deficit in infancy and early childhood.
    Birch EE; Hale LA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 Apr; 29(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 3356518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Wilensky JT; Hawkins A
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of neodymium: YAG capsulotomy on contrast sensitivity and the evaluation of methods for its assessment.
    Tan JC; Spalton DJ; Arden GB
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):703-9. PubMed ID: 10201590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.
    McGraw PV; Winn B; Gray LS; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 May; 20(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 10897339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Veterans Affairs Multicenter Low Vision Enhancement System (LVES) study: clinical results. Report 1: effects of manual-focus LVES on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
    Ballinger R; Lalle P; Maino J; Stelmack J; Tallman K; Wacker R
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):764-74. PubMed ID: 11145301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Associations between subjective and objective visual function in patients with unilateral macular holes.
    Mönestam E; Andersson M; Aström S
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 18061643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic measures of visual function and their relationship to self-report of visual functioning.
    Freeman EE; Muñoz B; Turano KA; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4762-6. PubMed ID: 17065485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations.
    Kasper T; Bühren J; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2022-9. PubMed ID: 17137978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual function and subjective perception of visual ability after macular hole surgery.
    Tranos PG; Ghazi-Nouri SM; Rubin GS; Adams ZC; Charteris DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):995-1002. PubMed ID: 15629291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Screening for ophthalmic disease in older subjects using visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
    Woods RL; Tregear SJ; Mitchell RA
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2318-26. PubMed ID: 9855166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in Zaire.
    Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D; Spileers W; Missotten L
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1996; 263():87-90. PubMed ID: 9396193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual function of police officers who have undergone refractive surgery.
    Hovis JK; Ramaswamy S
    Am J Ind Med; 2006 Nov; 49(11):885-94. PubMed ID: 17036347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intermediate spatial frequency letter contrast sensitivity: its relation to visual resolution before and during amblyopia treatment.
    Moseley MJ; Stewart CE; Fielder AR; Stephens DA;
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16390475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association of lens opacities, intraocular straylight, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in European drivers.
    Michael R; van Rijn LJ; van den Berg TJ; Barraquer RI; Grabner G; Wilhelm H; Coeckelbergh T; Emesz M; Marvan P; Nischler C
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 87(6):666-71. PubMed ID: 18786129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.