These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8944198)

  • 41. Impact of visual impairment on measures of cognitive function for children with congenital toxoplasmosis: implications for compensatory intervention strategies.
    Roizen N; Kasza K; Karrison T; Mets M; Noble AG; Boyer K; Swisher C; Meier P; Remington J; Jalbrzikowski J; McLeod R; Kipp M; Rabiah P; Chamot D; Estes R; Cezar S; Mack D; Pfiffner L; Stein M; Danis B; Patel D; Hopkins J; Holfels E; Stein L; Withers S; Cameron A; Perkins J; Heydemann P
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e379-90. PubMed ID: 16864640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [The influrence of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity on subjective evaluation of visual function before and after cataract surgery].
    Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2005 Jul; 61(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 16164095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Associations of human crystalline lens retrodots and waterclefts with visual impairment: an observational study.
    Frost NA; Sparrow JM; Moore L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(7):2105-9. PubMed ID: 12091403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
    Becker R; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Arabic near test chart for partially sighted patients.
    Oduntan AO
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):450-2. PubMed ID: 8944190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
    Rabin J; Wicks J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Sonksen logMAR test of visual acuity: II. Age norms from 2 years 9 months to 8 years.
    Sonksen PM; Wade AM; Proffitt R; Heavens S; Salt AT
    J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17651997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Visual acuity vs letter contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Alexander KR; Derlacki DJ; Fishman GA
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1495-9. PubMed ID: 7645278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Interocular accommodative disparities: asymmetry and/or paresis?].
    Kunnert-Speeg C; Lobstein-Henry Y; Sahel J; Flament J; Bronner A
    Ophtalmologie; 1989; 3(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 2641086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [How should visual acuity be measured?].
    Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1996 Jul; 52(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 8768473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contrast sensitivity and visual hallucinations in patients referred to a low vision rehabilitation clinic.
    Jackson ML; Bassett K; Nirmalan PV; Sayre EC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 91(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 17035271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Determining visual acuity using European normal values: scientific principles and possibilities for automatic measurement].
    Bach M; Kommerell G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):190-5. PubMed ID: 9644663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease.
    Kiser AK; Mladenovich D; Eshraghi F; Bourdeau D; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):946-54. PubMed ID: 16317369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Simple clinical techniques to evaluate visual function in patients with early cataract.
    Elliott DB; Hurst MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 67(11):822-5. PubMed ID: 2250890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Contrast sensitivity function of the visual system].
    Kedzia B
    Klin Oczna; 1988; 90(4-5):178-82. PubMed ID: 3241527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.