408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8944615)
1. Tumour heterogeneity of DNA cell cycle variables in breast cancer measured by flow cytometry.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Nov; 49(11):931-7. PubMed ID: 8944615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliable DNA histogram interpretation. Number of nuclei requiring measurement with flow cytometry.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Aug; 19(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 9267560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer cases.
Bergers E; Montironi R; van Diest PJ; Prete E; Baak JP
Hum Pathol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8666364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 9056743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intratumoral variations in DNA ploidy and s-phase fraction in human breast cancer.
Arnerlöv C; Emdin SO; Cajander S; Bengtsson NO; Tavelin B; Roos G
Anal Cell Pathol; 2001; 23(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 11790856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Steroid receptor heterogeneity in relation to DNA index in breast cancer: a multiparameter flow cytometric approach on paraffin-embedded tumor samples.
Leers MP; Nap M
Breast J; 2001; 7(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 11678803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA ploidy and proliferation heterogeneity in human prostate cancers.
Shankey TV; Jin JK; Dougherty S; Flanigan RC; Graham S; Pyle JM
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 21(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 8529468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic comparative study of S-phase fraction and Ki-67 index in breast carcinoma.
Pinto AE; André S; Pereira T; Nóbrega S; Soares J
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jul; 54(7):543-9. PubMed ID: 11429427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cell cycle analysis of 932 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast carcinoma material. Correlations between flow cytometric, clinical, and pathologic variables. MMMCP Collaborative Group. Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project Collaborative Group.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cancer; 1996 Jun; 77(11):2258-66. PubMed ID: 8635093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of variation in DNA flow cytometric analyses from paraffin-embedded breast cancers. Evaluation of the grading efficiency of ploidy determination, DNA index, and S-phase fraction.
Collan Y; Klemi P; Kallioniemi OP; Joensuu H; Nordling S; Eskelinen M
Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):581-6. PubMed ID: 1409093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction as independent prognostic markers for node-negative breast cancer specimens.
Bagwell CB; Clark GM; Spyratos F; Chassevent A; Bendahl PO; Stål O; Killander D; Jourdan ML; Romain S; Hunsberger B; Baldetorp B
Cytometry; 2001 Jun; 46(3):121-35. PubMed ID: 11449403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy.
Yuan J; Hennessy C; Givan AL; Corbett IP; Henry JA; Sherbet GV; Lennard TW
Br J Cancer; 1992 Mar; 65(3):461-5. PubMed ID: 1348424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA flow cytometry in surgically treated lung cancer--prognostic significance.
Ikonen JT; Ojala A; Salenius JP; Mattila J; Riekkinen H; Wigren T
Scand Cardiovasc J; 1999; 33(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 10517210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic implications of different cell cycle analysis models of flow cytometric DNA histograms of 1,301 breast cancer patients: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP).
Bergers E; Baak JP; van Diest PJ; van Gorp LH; Kwee WS; Los J; Peterse HL; Ruitenberg HM; Schapers RF; Somsen JG; van Beek MW; Bellot SM; Fijnheer J
Int J Cancer; 1997 Jun; 74(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 9221802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lack of prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and S phase fraction in breast cancer.
Stanton PD; Cooke TG; Oakes SJ; Winstanley J; Holt S; George WD; Murray GD
Br J Cancer; 1992 Nov; 66(5):925-9. PubMed ID: 1419638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flow cytometric analysis of ploidy in solid neoplasms: comparison of fresh tissues with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens.
Frierson HF
Hum Pathol; 1988 Mar; 19(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 2450060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
