These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8944619)

  • 21. A computerised cancer registration network in the Veneto region, north-east of Italy: a pilot study.
    Simonato L; Zambon P; Rodella S; Giordano R; Guzzinati S; Stocco C; Tognazzo S; Winkelmann R
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Jun; 73(11):1436-9. PubMed ID: 8645594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. General practice registration networks in the Netherlands: a brief report.
    Hart HE; van der Wouden JC; Höppener P; van Schendel GJ; Knottnerus JA
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1999; 6(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 10094070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
    Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limitations of using a cancer registry to identify incident primary intracranial tumours.
    Counsell CE; Collie DA; Grant R
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1997 Jul; 63(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 9221974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Benefits and limitations of pathology databases to cancer registries.
    Newcombe RG
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 50(4):354. PubMed ID: 9215158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison with manual registration reveals satisfactory completeness and efficiency of a computerized cancer registration system.
    Contiero P; Tittarelli A; Maghini A; Fabiano S; Frassoldi E; Costa E; Gada D; Codazzi T; Crosignani P; Tessandori R; Tagliabue G
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 17452020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
    Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Colorectal cancer registration: the central importance of pathology.
    Manser MD; Levine DF; Pheby DF; Pitcher RW
    J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):875-7. PubMed ID: 11127275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cancer registration by linking pathology and district PAS data.
    Codling BW; Pheby D; Hagen DL; Duffin MF
    Br J Cancer; 1990 Aug; 62(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 2386742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project.
    Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D
    J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving Central Cancer Registry Surveillance through Interstate Data Exchange of Electronic Pathology Reports.
    Millar MM; Yoder V; Jozwik D; Espinoza J; Lemons D; Jewell CY; Sweeney C
    J Registry Manag; 2021; 48(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 35380997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Case Ascertainment of Pediatric Brain Tumours: The Alberta Experience.
    Chris N; Vivek M; Douglas S; Juanita H; Faith D
    J Registry Manag; 2016; 41(3):122-127. PubMed ID: 28121312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Previously unidentified duplicate registrations of clinical trials: an exploratory analysis of registry data worldwide.
    van Valkenhoef G; Loane RF; Zarin DA
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jul; 5(1):116. PubMed ID: 27422636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
    Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated classification of free-text pathology reports for registration of incident cases of cancer.
    Jouhet V; Defossez G; Burgun A; le Beux P; Levillain P; Ingrand P; Claveau V
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 21792466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The completeness and timeliness of cancer registration and the implications for measuring cancer burden.
    Donnelly C; Cairnduff V; Chen JJ; Kearney T; Fitzpatrick D; Fox C; Gavin A
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():101-107. PubMed ID: 28600946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A short history of pathology registries, with emphasis on cancer registries.
    Terracini B; Zanetti R
    Soz Praventivmed; 2003; 48(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 12756884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiple primary malignant neoplasms in England and Wales, 1971-1981.
    Coleman MP
    Yale J Biol Med; 1986; 59(5):517-31. PubMed ID: 3798971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Establishment of an Asian Cancer Registry Network - problems and perspectives.
    Moore MA; Shin HR; Curado MP; Sobue T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):815-32. PubMed ID: 19256782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The public health uses of the Scottish Community Health Index (CHI).
    Womersley J
    J Public Health Med; 1996 Dec; 18(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 9023807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.