These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8944798)

  • 1. Reducing your malpractice vulnerability.
    Hannah HW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1996 Dec; 209(11):1859-60. PubMed ID: 8944798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review: pros and cons.
    Hannah HW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1994 May; 204(9):1352-3. PubMed ID: 8050970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician peer review. Serving the patient or the physician?
    Cate MJ
    J Leg Med; 1999 Dec; 20(4):479-506. PubMed ID: 10641461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laws vary on use of peer review records in litigation.
    Berliner MC
    Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10281935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer Review. Can the Board of Medical Practice subpoena your files?
    Mitchell LE; Bunde DP; Struthers MS; Wraspir KL; Moos RE
    Minn Med; 2000 Nov; 83(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 11126484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent Developments in Medicine and the Law.
    Taylor M; Sweppe C; Mueller P
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2016; 51(2):582-99. PubMed ID: 30024121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protected peer review.
    Cosgrove MJ
    Del Med J; 1988 Jun; 60(6):349. PubMed ID: 3396739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. They just don't get it.
    Hackney VH; Le Grand AC
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hidden member benefit.
    Nicol GH
    Todays FDA; 2012; 24(1):8-9, 11-3. PubMed ID: 22474921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review of the expert witness: an opportunity to improve our medical liability system.
    Fadjo D; Bucciarelli RL
    J Child Neurol; 1995 Sep; 10(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 7499761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immunity protections for peer review.
    Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1982 May; 78(5):72-3. PubMed ID: 7101208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Will your malpractice insurer stifle your defense?
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 1998 Jan; 75(1):36, 39-40, 43-8. PubMed ID: 10175877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
    McKinney P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resident files and the peer review privilege.
    Weiman DS; Mangiante E
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Aug; 94(8):16-8. PubMed ID: 19715000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review where it counts.
    Bryan CS
    J S C Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 85(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 2709821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National Practitioner Data Bank: the toy of the imperial Congress. When bad things happen to good doctors.
    Gale AH
    Mo Med; 1992 Oct; 89(10):720-6. PubMed ID: 1491664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The latest word on confidentiality of peer review.
    Cronan CJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 96(12):491-3. PubMed ID: 9879179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are peer review decisions still binding?
    Power JM
    N Y State Dent J; 1991; 57(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 1923144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA).
    Wecht CH
    Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal discussions in medical literature: is there adequate peer review?
    Kapp MB
    Med Law; 1988; 7(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 3210912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.