BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8945023)

  • 1. Effect of pentaphasic pulse sequence as an impedance sensor on standard electrocardiographic recordings.
    Mortazavi S; Park E; Florio J; Poore J; Bornzin G; Levine PA; Sholder J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1678-81. PubMed ID: 8945023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The safety of digital mobile cellular telephones with minute ventilation rate adaptive pacemakers.
    Sparks PB; Mond HG; Joyner KH; Wood MP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Oct; 19(10):1451-5. PubMed ID: 8904535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Present day pacemakers for pulse generator exchange: is 3.5 V a sufficient nominal setting for the pulse amplitude? Thera Pacemaker Study Group.
    Schuchert A; Van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1824-7. PubMed ID: 8945049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New integrated sensor pacemaker: comparison of rate responses between an integrated minute ventilation and activity sensor and single sensor modes during exercise and daily activities and nonphysiological interference.
    Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO; Leung Z
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1664-71. PubMed ID: 8945021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro testing of pacemakers for digital cellular phone electromagnetic interference.
    Ruggera PS; Witters DM; Bassen HI
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(4):358-71. PubMed ID: 9262836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate responsive cardiac pacing using a minute ventilation sensor.
    Abrahamsen AM; Barvik S; Aarsland T; Dickstein K
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Aug; 16(8):1650-5. PubMed ID: 7690933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of pacing output coupling capacitance for sensing the evoked response.
    Sperzel J; Neuzner J; Schwarz T; Zhu Q; König A; Kay GN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Sep; 24(9 Pt 1):1377-82. PubMed ID: 11584460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility of using intracardiac impedance measurements for capture detection.
    Alt E; Kriegler C; Fotuhi P; Willhaus R; Combs W; Heinz M; Hayes D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1873-9. PubMed ID: 1279563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is local myocardial contractility related to endocardial acceleration signals detected by a transvenous pacing lead?
    Bongiorni MG; Soldati E; Arena G; Quirino G; Vernazza F; Bernasconi A; Garberoglio B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1682-8. PubMed ID: 8945024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up of a minute ventilation rate adaptive pacemaker.
    Li H; Neubauer SA; Hayes DL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1826-9. PubMed ID: 1279555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of piezoelectric units on pacemaker function: an in vitro study.
    Gomez G; Jara F; Sánchez B; Roig M; Duran-Sindreu F
    J Endod; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1296-9. PubMed ID: 24041395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transvalvular impedance (TVI) recording under electrical and pharmocological cardiac stimulation.
    Di Gregorio F; Morra A; Finesso M; Bongiorni MG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1689-93. PubMed ID: 8945025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 13 μA analog signal processing IC for accurate recognition of multiple intra-cardiac signals.
    Yan L; Pettine J; Mitra S; Kim S; Jee DW; Kim H; Osawa M; Harada Y; Tamiya K; Van Hoof C; Yazicioglu RF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2013 Dec; 7(6):785-95. PubMed ID: 24473543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interference of cellular phones with implanted permanent pacemakers.
    Chen WH; Lau CP; Leung SK; Ho DS; Lee IS
    Clin Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11):881-6. PubMed ID: 8914782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
    Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of electromagnetic filters of cardiac pacemakers tested by cellular telephone ringing.
    Trigano A; Blandeau O; Dale C; Wong MF; Wiart J
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Aug; 2(8):837-41. PubMed ID: 16051120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial clinical experience with a new dual sensor SSIR pacemaker controlled by body activity and minute ventilation.
    Alt E; Combs W; Fotuhi P; Bambl E; Wahlstrand J; Willhaus R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1487-95. PubMed ID: 7479170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polygraphic belt with force-sensing expander for physiological tests on cosmonauts.
    Rafolt D; Gallasch E
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2001 Sep; 46(9):230-5. PubMed ID: 11593979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical procedure to prevent electromagnetic interference with electronic medical equipment.
    Hanada E; Takano K; Antoku Y; Matsumura K; Watanabe Y; Nose Y
    J Med Syst; 2002 Feb; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 11777312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiological sensitivity of respiratory-dependent cardiac pacing: four-year follow-up.
    Rossi P; Prando MD; Magnani A; Aina F; Rognoni G; Occhetta E
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Sep; 11(9):1267-78. PubMed ID: 2460830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.