These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8945023)

  • 21. Performance of a 3.2-mm to 6-mm adaptor.
    Sweesy MW; Forney RC; Erickson S; Batey RL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 7513396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rate responsive pacing using a minute ventilation sensor.
    Mond H; Strathmore N; Kertes P; Hunt D; Baker G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1866-74. PubMed ID: 2463560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital signal processing by virtual instrumentation of a MEMS magnetic field sensor for biomedical applications.
    Juárez-Aguirre R; Domínguez-Nicolás SM; Manjarrez E; Tapia JA; Figueras E; Vázquez-Leal H; Aguilera-Cortés LA; Herrera-May AL
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Nov; 13(11):15068-84. PubMed ID: 24196434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electromagnetic interference with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from low-frequency electromagnetic fields in vivo.
    Tiikkaja M; Aro AL; Alanko T; Lindholm H; Sistonen H; Hartikainen JE; Toivonen L; Juutilainen J; Hietanen M
    Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 23125355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electromagnetic interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and digital cellular phones: experimental study.
    Trigano AJ; Azoulay A; Rochdi M; Campillo A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):588-93. PubMed ID: 10234711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Suppression of ventricular output by noise in the atrial channel in a dual chamber pacemaker.
    Ben-Zur UM; Kahn S; Gross JN; Platt SB; Goodfriend MA; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1586-8. PubMed ID: 7479181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Low stimulation impedance in pacemaker patients with cardiac diseases. The Thera Pacemaker Study Group].
    Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Aug; 121(34-35):1046-9. PubMed ID: 8829905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cardiorespiratory Mechanical Simulator for In Vitro Testing of Impedance Minute Ventilation Sensors in Cardiac Pacemakers.
    Marcelli E; Cercenelli L
    ASAIO J; 2016; 62(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 26501915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Extraneous signal modification of cardiac pacemakers by high frequency fields].
    Hansen V
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 3():292-3. PubMed ID: 2078741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Pacemaker dysfunction during use of a mobile telephone].
    Vlasínová J; Novotný T
    Vnitr Lek; 2000 Feb; 46(2):119-21. PubMed ID: 11048537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pacemaker sensitivity to 50 Hz noise voltages.
    Irnich W; Steen-Mueller MK
    Europace; 2011 Sep; 13(9):1319-26. PubMed ID: 21551474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Monitoring equipment induced tachycardia in patients with minute ventilation rate-responsive pacemakers.
    Southorn PA; Kamath GS; Vasdev GM; Hayes DL
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Apr; 84(4):508-9. PubMed ID: 10823106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electronic article surveillance: a possible danger for pacemaker patients.
    Dodinot B; Godenir JP; Costa AB
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jan; 16(1 Pt 1):46-53. PubMed ID: 7681175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bipolar versus unipolar issues in DDD pacing.
    Baker RG; Falkenberg EN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Nov; 7(6 Pt 2):1178-82. PubMed ID: 6209655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implantable rhythm devices and electromagnetic interference: myth or reality?
    Dyrda K; Khairy P
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Jul; 6(6):823-32. PubMed ID: 18570620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. U.S. experience with the AddVent VDD(R) pacing system. AddVent Phase I Investigators.
    Gessman L; White M; Ghaly N; Raman S; Damm D; Macfie J; Timko C; Fields E
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1764-7. PubMed ID: 8945036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is there a risk for interaction between mobile phones and single lead VDD pacemakers?
    Nowak B; Rosocha S; Zellerhoff C; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Voigtländer T; Meyer J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Oct; 19(10):1447-50. PubMed ID: 8904534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical assessment of a new method for pacing pulse detection using a hybrid circuit in digital Holter monitoring.
    Mori N; Hara M; Miyake F; Sato C; Murayama M; Tamamura K; Kaneko M; Sirakawa O
    Jpn Circ J; 2000 Aug; 64(8):583-9. PubMed ID: 10952154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of electrical characteristics between a steroid-eluting single-pass VDD lead and a standard steroid-eluting ventricular lead. Thera Pacemaker Study Group.
    Schuchert A; Van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1787-9. PubMed ID: 9249832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electromagnetic interference of endodontic equipments with cardiovascular implantable electronic device.
    Dadalti MT; da Cunha AJ; de Araújo MC; de Moraes LG; Risso Pde A
    J Dent; 2016 Mar; 46():68-72. PubMed ID: 26765669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.