These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8945454)

  • 1. A case for instant peer review?
    Henneberg M
    Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6608):401. PubMed ID: 8945454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A case for instant peer review?
    Pillinger CT
    Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6608):401. PubMed ID: 8945453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review and refereeing in science.
    Lore W
    East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review should continue after publication.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [To improve transparency of biomedical publications].
    Watine J; Friedberg B
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 15047484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of publishing newsworthy epidemiology.
    Johnston SC; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2010 Aug; 68(2):A8-10. PubMed ID: 20695003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dangers of advocacy in science.
    Gitzen RA
    Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5839):748. PubMed ID: 17690275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Program descriptions: information for authors and peer reviewers.
    Huston P; Elmslie T
    CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 8873635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
    Michell B
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
    Fisher RS; Powers LE
    Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
    Shim EH; Parekh V
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.