These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8946369)
1. Understanding the relative sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation. Yip KL; Whiting BR; Kocher TE; Trauernicht DP; Van Metter RL Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1727-37. PubMed ID: 8946369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resolution degradation due to K-characteristic photon absorption in dual phosphor image receptors. McLean D Med Phys; 1999 Apr; 26(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 10227367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation and its relationship to image contrast. Castle JW Radiology; 1977 Mar; 122(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 841075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose. Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scatter-to-primary ratio and absorption efficiency in screen-film and computed radiography systems. McLean D; Gray JE Eur J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 21(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 8777912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom. Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; So JC; Dutta AK J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12540823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed radiography as a gamma ray detector--dose response and applications. O'Keeffe DS; McLeod RW Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3559-72. PubMed ID: 15446787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems. Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose. Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technique charts for EC film: direct optical measurements to account for the effects of X-ray scatter. Munro P; Jordan K; Lewis C; Heerema T Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jul; 50(3):829-36. PubMed ID: 11395253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam. Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography. Doyle P; Martin CJ Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An investigation of the shielding characteristics of computed radiography cassettes. Potts R; Baker K; Bridge L Br J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 81(962):151-3. PubMed ID: 18238923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The spectrum and angular distribution of x rays scattered from a water phantom. Cheng CW; Taylor KW; Holloway AF Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1235-45. PubMed ID: 7476709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system. Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Lehmann KJ Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2289-303. PubMed ID: 15551554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dependence of radiographic sensitivity of CR imaging plate on X-ray tube voltage. Asai Y; Uemura M; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jan; 1(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 20821170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blurring artifacts in megavoltage radiography with a flat-panel imaging system: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations with measurements. Schach von Wittenau AE; Logan CM; Aufderheide MB; Slone DM Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2559-70. PubMed ID: 12462723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Siewerdsen JH; Yorkston J; Huang W; Scarpine VE; Street RA Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 9029541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast estimation of first-order scattering in a medical x-ray computed tomography scanner using a ray-tracing technique. Liu X J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 25408392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system. Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]