These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: general overview of fluoroscopic imaging. Schueler BA Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1115-26. PubMed ID: 10903700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique]. Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)]. Weberling R Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic]. Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography]. Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality]. Brandt GA Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine]. Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity. Borasi G; Bregant P; Crespi A; De Denaro M; Ferretti PP; De Guarrini F; Levrero F; Mozzo P; Novario R; Pedroli G Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 8327771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Resolution in radiographic magnification. Wagner LK; Cohen G; Wong WH; Amtey SR Med Phys; 1981; 8(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 7322061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Modification of the quality of the roentgen image by screen and film--experimental studies]. Maurer HJ; Goos F Rontgenblatter; 1985 Feb; 38(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 3983537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment]. Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative evaluation of several rare-earth film-screen systems. Braun M; Wilson BC Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 7111746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit. Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]