These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8947673)
1. Centromere attribute integration based chromosome polarity assignment. Stanley RJ; Keller J; Caldwell CW; Gader P Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():284-8. PubMed ID: 8947673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A centromere attribute integration approach to centromere identification. Stanley R; Keller J; Caldwell CW; Gader P Biomed Sci Instrum; 1996; 32():23-9. PubMed ID: 8672673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes. Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On fully automatic feature measurement for banded chromosome classification. Piper J; Granum E Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 2714109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic karyotyping of metaphase cells with overlapping chromosomes. Popescu M; Gader P; Keller J; Klein C; Stanley J; Caldwell C Comput Biol Med; 1999 Jan; 29(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 10207655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of artificial neural networks to chromosome classification. Errington PA; Graham J Cytometry; 1993; 14(6):627-39. PubMed ID: 8404369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing. Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping. Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification. Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral. Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MetaSel: a metaphase selection tool using a Gaussian-based classification technique. Uttamatanin R; Yuvapoositanon P; Intarapanich A; Kaewkamnerd S; Phuksaritanon R; Assawamakin A; Tongsima S BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S13. PubMed ID: 24564477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rectification of distorted chromosome image: automatic determination of density profiles. Hazout S; Mignot J; Guiguet M; Valleron AJ Comput Biol Med; 1984; 14(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 6713832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system. van Vliet LJ; Young IT; Mayall BH Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 2307062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Band features as classification measures for G-banded chromosome analysis. Johnston DA; Tang KS; Zimmerman S Comput Biol Med; 1993 Mar; 23(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 8513663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stylized chromosome images. Martin AO; Isenstein BS; Thomas CW; Rzeszotarski MS; Johnson WE Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 2307061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel metric for bone marrow cells chromosome pairing. Khmelinskii A; Ventura R; Sanches J IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1420-9. PubMed ID: 20172790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The DNA-based human karyotype. Mayall BH; Carrano AV; Moore DH; Ashworth LK; Bennett DE; Mendelsohn ML Cytometry; 1984 Jul; 5(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 6205836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]