These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8947899)

  • 1. Response to "Comment on 'dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners' " [Med. Phys. 23, 205-220 (1996)].
    Liang Y; Kruger RA
    Med Phys; 1996 Nov; 23(11):1865. PubMed ID: 8947899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners.
    Liang Y; Kruger RA
    Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):205-220. PubMed ID: 8668101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation transfer functions of single-slice and dual-slice computed tomography scanners.
    Venema HW
    Med Phys; 1996 Nov; 23(11):1863-4. PubMed ID: 8947898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced single-slice rebinning in cone-beam spiral CT.
    Kachelriess M; Schaller S; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2000 Apr; 27(4):754-72. PubMed ID: 10798698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart.
    Kachelriess M; Ulzheimer S; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1881-902. PubMed ID: 10984235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 64 slice MDCT generally underestimates coronary calcium scores as compared to EBT: a phantom study.
    Greuter MJ; Dijkstra H; Groen JM; Vliegenthart R; de Lange F; Renema WK; de Bock GH; Oudkerk M
    Med Phys; 2007 Sep; 34(9):3510-9. PubMed ID: 17926954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system.
    McCollough CH; Zink FE
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2223-30. PubMed ID: 10587202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating multislice imaging into x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry.
    Johnston H; Hilts M; Jirasek A
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1666-77. PubMed ID: 25832056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?
    Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introduction to coronary imaging with 64-slice computed tomography.
    Cademartiri F; Runza G; Belgrano M; Luccichenti G; Mollet NR; Malagutti P; Silvestrini M; Midiri M; Cova M; Pozzi Mucelli R; Krestin GP
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):16-41. PubMed ID: 16163137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy in contouring of small and low contrast lesions: comparison between diagnostic quality computed tomography scanner and computed tomography simulation scanner-A phantom study.
    Ho YW; Wong WK; Yu SK; Lam WW; Geng H
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 22626967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and performance evaluation of an experimental fine pitch detector multislice CT scanner.
    Imai Y; Nukui M; Ishihara Y; Fujishige T; Ogata K; Moritake M; Kurochi H; Ogata T; Yahata M; Tang X
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1120-7. PubMed ID: 19472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of an automatic dose control system for CT: specifications and basic phantom tests.
    Nagel HD; Stumpp P; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2011 Jan; 183(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 20938882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys.
    Van der Molen AJ; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):248-55. PubMed ID: 17038410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation. Multislice computed tomography systems.
    Health Devices; 2002 May; 31(5):161-88. PubMed ID: 12449920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spiral CT-angiography with one, four, and sixteen slice scanners. Technical note.
    Cademartiri F; Luccichenti G; Marano R; Nieman K; Mollet N; de Feyter P; Krestin GP; Pavone P; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 2003 Oct; 106(4):269-83. PubMed ID: 14612819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of correlated dose and sensitivity profiles on a multi-slice CT scanner.
    Bahar Gogani J; Hägglund P; Wickman G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):332-6. PubMed ID: 15933132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral material characterization with dual-energy CT: comparison of commercial and investigative technologies in phantoms.
    Gabbai M; Leichter I; Mahgerefteh S; Sosna J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):960-9. PubMed ID: 25182803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.