These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8948243)

  • 21. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Rahman WA; Amenábar T; Hetaimish BM; Safir OA; Kuzyk PR; Gross AE
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 27378637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Abdel MP; Cottino U; Larson DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):873-881. PubMed ID: 28509828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Femoral Bone Restoration Patterns in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Distally Fixed Modular Tapered Titanium Stems and an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Approach.
    Ladurner A; Zdravkovic V; Grob K
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2210-2217. PubMed ID: 29599032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
    Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.
    Weber M; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Sep; 80(9):1295-305. PubMed ID: 9759814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV development dislocation of hip].
    Li Y; Ma W; Sun J; Song X; An M; Zhang Q
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 24279008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
    Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revision total hip arthroplasty with femoral impaction bone grafting.
    Yan CH; Chiu KY; Ng TP; Ng FY
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Dec; 18(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 21187540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Total hip arthroplasty using proximal porous coating stem with distal sleeve: mid-term outcome.
    Saito M; Takahashi KA; Fujioka M; Ueshima K; Sakao K; Inoue S; Kubo T
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19398791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patch-grafting for regional femoral bone loss in cementless revision hip arthroplasty.
    Hussell JG; Learmonth ID
    S Afr J Surg; 1995 Dec; 33(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 8677472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Total Hip Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Tapered Femoral Component in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: A Minimum 20-Year Follow-Up Study.
    McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1275-1278. PubMed ID: 26781396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders.
    Malkani AL; Settecerri JJ; Sim FH; Chao EY; Wallrichs SL
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 May; 77(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 7744913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component.
    Chandler HP; Ayres DK; Tan RC; Anderson LC; Varma AK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):130-40. PubMed ID: 7554622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Wang L; Dai Z; Wen T; Li M; Hu Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Feb; 133(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 23124491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
    Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Mulroy WF; Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Dec; 77(12):1845-52. PubMed ID: 8550652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.