These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8949469)
1. Self-marking in written examination: a way of feedback and learning. Löfgren M; Lundahl L Med Educ; 1996 Sep; 30(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 8949469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Portfolios as a learning tool in obstetrics and gynaecology undergraduate training. Lonka K; Slotte V; Halttunen M; Kurki T; Tiitinen A; Vaara L; Paavonen J Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35(12):1125-30. PubMed ID: 11895236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions by medical students of their educational environment for obstetrics and gynaecology in metropolitan and rural teaching sites. Carmody DF; Jacques A; Denz-Penhey H; Puddey I; Newnham JP Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):e596-602. PubMed ID: 19995161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) as formative assessment in undergraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a cohort study. Deane RP; Joyce P; Murphy DJ BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():172. PubMed ID: 26453191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Student evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology: self- versus departmental assessment. Herbert WN; McGaghie WC; Droegemueller W; Riddle MH; Maxwell KL Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):458-61. PubMed ID: 2381623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introducing multiple-choice questions to promote learning for medical students: effect on exam performance in obstetrics and gynecology. Jud SM; Cupisti S; Frobenius W; Winkler A; Schultheis F; Antoniadis S; Beckmann MW; Heindl F Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1401-1406. PubMed ID: 32865608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intersecting gender, evaluations, and examinations: Averting gender bias in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship in the United States. Jacques L; Kaljo K; Treat R; Davis J; Farez R; Lund M Educ Health (Abingdon); 2016; 29(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 26996795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A conference on ethics for obstetric and gynaecological clerkship students. Strong C; Beckmann CR; Dacus JV Med Educ; 1992 Sep; 26(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 1435373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The R-I-M-E method for evaluation of medical students on an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Ogburn T; Espey E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 189(3):666-9. PubMed ID: 14526289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical students' evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology. Fantl JA; Papp KK; Dunn LJ Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):440-2. PubMed ID: 6462577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of medical ethics of fourth-year medical students. Phaosavasdi S; Taneepanichsakul S; Witoonpanich P; Tannirandorn Y; Pruksananonda K; Uerpairojkit B; Sittisomwong T; Phupong V; Manchana T; Nirutisart S J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Sep; 93(9):1115-8. PubMed ID: 20873089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of a personal learning plan supported by an induction meeting on academic performance in undergraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Deane RP; Murphy DJ BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():43. PubMed ID: 25889796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Student evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology clerkships in the United States and Canada, 1985. Beckmann CR; Barzansky BM; Eden RD; Ling FW; Waxman B J Reprod Med; 1989 May; 34(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 2732982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Embedding assessment in a simulation skills training program for medical and midwifery students: A pre- and post-intervention evaluation. Kumar A; Nestel D; East C; Hay M; Lichtwark I; McLelland G; Bentley D; Hall H; Fernando S; Hobson S; Larmour L; Dekoninck P; Wallace EM Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 58(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 28656616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exam preparation course in obstetrics and gynecology for the German Medical State Examination: proof of concept and implications for the recruitment of future residents. Riedel F; Fremd C; Tabatabai P; Smetanay K; Doster A; Heil J; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Hennigs A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 294(6):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 27506659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The assessment of clinical competence in obstetrics and gynaecology in two medical schools by an objective structured clinical examination. McFaul PB; Taylor DJ; Howie PW Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Sep; 100(9):842-6. PubMed ID: 8218006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The essential elements of undergraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynecology: a comparison of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Medical Student Educational Objectives and the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination. Hammoud MM; Cox SM; Goff B; Goepfert A; Butler A; Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Katz NT; Erickson SS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 193(5):1773-9. PubMed ID: 16260232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades? Weiss PM; Koller CA; Hess LW; Wasser T Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 16147799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of quantitative feedback on student performance on the National Board Medical Examination in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Brar MK; Laube DW; Bett GC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):530.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17980197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To the point: gender differences in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Craig LB; Buery-Joyner SD; Bliss S; Everett EN; Forstein DA; Graziano SC; Hampton BS; McKenzie ML; Morgan H; Page-Ramsey SM; Pradhan A; Hopkins L; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):430-435. PubMed ID: 29852154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]