These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8951547)

  • 1. A reliable and cost-effective in vitro assay of skin viability for skin banks and burn centers.
    Klein MB; Shaw D; Barese S; Chapo GA; Cuono CB
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1996; 17(6 Pt 1):565-70. PubMed ID: 8951547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of storage and preservation methods on viability in transplantable human skin allografts.
    Bravo D; Rigley TH; Gibran N; Strong DM; Newman-Gage H
    Burns; 2000 Jun; 26(4):367-78. PubMed ID: 10751705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cryopreserved donor skin viability: the experience of the regional tissue bank of Verona.
    Franchini M; Zanini D; Bosinelli A; Fiorini S; Rizzi S; D'Aloja C; Vassanelli A; Gandini G; Aprili G
    Blood Transfus; 2009 Apr; 7(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 19503630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of donor skin viability: fresh and cryopreserved skin using tetrazolioum salt assay.
    Castagnoli C; Alotto D; Cambieri I; Casimiri R; Aluffi M; Stella M; Alasia ST; Magliacani G
    Burns; 2003 Dec; 29(8):759-67. PubMed ID: 14636749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine assessment of viability in split-thickness skin.
    Yang H; Jia XM; Acker JP; Lung G; McGann LE
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000; 21(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 10752741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical note: comparison of the PrestoBlue and LDH release assays with the MTT assay for skin viability assessment.
    Gaucher S; Jarraya M
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2015 Sep; 16(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 25330757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Successful preservation of human skin by vitrification.
    Fujita T; Takami Y; Ezoe K; Saito T; Sato AK; Takeda N; Yamamoto Y; Homma K; Jimbow K; Sato N
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000; 21(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 10935811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cryopreserved porcine tendons preserve cell viability after thawing.
    Sass K; Corterier C; Brylla E; Löffler S; Steen M; Spanel-Borowski K
    Transplant Proc; 2009 Jun; 41(5):1911-3. PubMed ID: 19545755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple human dermal model for assessment of in vitro attachment efficiency of stored cultured epithelial autografts.
    Ghosh MM; Boyce SG; Freedlander E; MacNeil S
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 8582920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical application and viability of cryopreserved cadaveric skin allografts in severe burn: a retrospective analysis.
    Cleland H; Wasiak J; Dobson H; Paul M; Pratt G; Paul E; Herson M; Akbarzadeh S
    Burns; 2014 Feb; 40(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 24018216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current trends in the use of allograft skin for patients with burns and reflections on the future of skin banking in the United States.
    Greenleaf G; Hansbrough JF
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994; 15(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 7995816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The viability change of pigskin in vitro.
    Ge L; Sun L; Chen J; Mao X; Kong Y; Xiong F; Wu J; Wei H
    Burns; 2010 Jun; 36(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 19836142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of cryopreserved donor skin viability: the experience of the regional tissue bank of Siena.
    Pianigiani E; Tognetti L; Ierardi F; Mariotti G; Rubegni P; Cevenini G; Perotti R; Fimiani M
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2016 Jun; 17(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 26939692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viability of cadaver skin grafts stored in skin bank at two different temperatures.
    De A; Mathur M; Gore MA
    Indian J Med Res; 2008 Dec; 128(6):769-71. PubMed ID: 19246803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing and optimization of an electrochemical substitute for the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) cell viability assay.
    Mazloum-Ardakani M; Barazesh B; Moshtaghioun SM; Sheikhha MH
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14966. PubMed ID: 31628354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cryopreservation of composite tissues and transplantation: preliminary studies.
    Cui X; Gao DY; Fink BF; Vasconez HC; Rinker B
    Cryobiology; 2007 Dec; 55(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 17963742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cryopreservation of skin using a murine model: validation of a prognostic viability assay.
    Kearney JN; Wheldon LA; Gowland G
    Cryobiology; 1990 Feb; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 2311410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of quality control in a skin bank: tissue viability determination.
    Alotto D; Ariotti S; Graziano S; Verrua R; Stella M; Magliacani G; Castagnoli C
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2002; 3(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 15256893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liposomes and MTT cell viability assay: an incompatible affair.
    Angius F; Floris A
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Mar; 29(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 25481524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tetrazolium [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] reduction by mycoplasmas.
    Kirchhoff H; Maass C; Runge M; Franz B; Schmidt R; Quentmeier H; Mühlradt PF
    Int J Syst Bacteriol; 1992 Jul; 42(3):506-8. PubMed ID: 1503978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.