471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8953110)
1. Emerging resistance of anaerobic bacteria to antimicrobial agents in South Korea.
Lee K; Chong Y; Jeong SH; Xu XS; Kwon OH
Clin Infect Dis; 1996 Dec; 23 Suppl 1():S73-7. PubMed ID: 8953110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Sweden in 1983.
Nord CE; Olsson-Liljequist B
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1984; 43():44-9. PubMed ID: 6100139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Anaerobic Bacterial Clinical Isolates From 2014 to 2016, Including Recently Named or Renamed Species.
Byun JH; Kim M; Lee Y; Lee K; Chong Y
Ann Lab Med; 2019 Mar; 39(2):190-199. PubMed ID: 30430782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group species and other anaerobic bacteria to meropenem, imipenem, piperacillin, cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam, clindamycin and metronidazole.
Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Cherubin CE; Hillier SL
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Mar; 31(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 8486570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High incidence of cefoxitin and clindamycin resistance among anaerobes in Taiwan.
Teng LJ; Hsueh PR; Tsai JC; Liaw SJ; Ho SW; Luh KT
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2002 Sep; 46(9):2908-13. PubMed ID: 12183246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resistance trends of Bacteroides fragilis group over an 8-year period, 1997-2004, in Korea.
Roh KH; Kim S; Kim CK; Yum JH; Kim MS; Yong D; Lee K; Kim JM; Chong Y
Korean J Lab Med; 2009 Aug; 29(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 19726890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative in-vitro activity of Sch 34343 and other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.
Nord CE; Olsson-Liljequist B
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jun; 15 Suppl C():183-8. PubMed ID: 2863246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated in Johannesburg.
van der Westhuyzen I; Chalkley LJ
S Afr Med J; 1992 Nov; 82(5):314-7. PubMed ID: 1448710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter survey of the changing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, and Peptostreptococcus species.
Aldridge KE; Ashcraft D; Cambre K; Pierson CL; Jenkins SG; Rosenblatt JE
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2001 Apr; 45(4):1238-43. PubMed ID: 11257040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-vitro antibiotic susceptibility and molecular analysis of anaerobic bacteria isolated in Cape Town, South Africa.
Koch CL; Derby P; Abratt VR
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1998 Aug; 42(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 9738844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in the susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms to various antimicrobial agents 1979-1989.
Betriu C; Cabronero C; Gomez M; Picazo JJ
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Apr; 11(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 1396757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to antimicrobial agents.
Collignon PJ; Munro R; Morris G
Pathology; 1988 Jan; 20(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 3374973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of susceptibility results of the Bacteroides fragilis group and other anaerobes by traditional MIC results and statistical methods.
Aldridge KE; Johnson WD
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Mar; 39(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 9096180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Susceptibility of strict anaerobic bacteria to antibiotics in France: a multicenter study].
Grollier G; Mory F; Quentin C; Girard-Pipau F; Tigaud S; Sedallian A; Dubreuil L
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1994 May; 42(5):498-504. PubMed ID: 7824321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing trends in antimicrobial resistance among clinically important anaerobes and Bacteroides fragilis isolates causing nosocomial infections: emerging resistance to carbapenems.
Liu CY; Huang YT; Liao CH; Yen LC; Lin HY; Hsueh PR
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2008 Sep; 52(9):3161-8. PubMed ID: 18625771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anaerobic bacteria and bacterial infections: perspectives on treatment and resistance in Italy.
Panichi G; Di Rosa R; Enrico P; Babudieri S
Rev Infect Dis; 1990; 12 Suppl 2():S152-6. PubMed ID: 2305181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter study of antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Korea in 2012.
Lee Y; Park YJ; Kim MN; Uh Y; Kim MS; Lee K
Ann Lab Med; 2015 Sep; 35(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 26206683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Auckland: 1991-1996.
Shore KP; Pottumarthy S; Morris AJ
N Z Med J; 1999 Nov; 112(1099):424-6. PubMed ID: 10678225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance of anaerobic bacteria to antimicrobial agents in Spain.
Baquero F; Reig M
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Nov; 11(11):1016-20. PubMed ID: 1295754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Australia.
Chen SC; Gottlieb T; Palmer JM; Morris G; Gilbert GL
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1992 Dec; 30(6):811-20. PubMed ID: 1289355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
