These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8953272)

  • 1. Sequence alignment and fold recognition of fucosyltransferases.
    Breton C; Oriol R; Imberty A
    Glycobiology; 1996 Oct; 6(7):vii-xii. PubMed ID: 8953272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the efficiency of evolutionary change-based and side chain orientation-based fold recognition potentials.
    Vishnepolsky B; Managadze G; Pirtskhalava M
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1863-78. PubMed ID: 18175309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FORTE: a profile-profile comparison tool for protein fold recognition.
    Tomii K; Akiyama Y
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Mar; 20(4):594-5. PubMed ID: 14764565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment.
    Ginalski K; Rychlewski L
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():410-7. PubMed ID: 14579329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors limiting the performance of prediction-based fold recognition methods.
    de la Cruz X; Thornton JM
    Protein Sci; 1999 Apr; 8(4):750-9. PubMed ID: 10211821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models?
    Taly JF; Marin A; Gibrat JF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():6. PubMed ID: 18179702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fold recognition by predicted alignment accuracy.
    Xu J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2005; 2(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17044180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences.
    Jones DT
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Apr; 287(4):797-815. PubMed ID: 10191147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pitfalls of protein sequence analysis.
    Rost B; Valencia A
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 1996 Aug; 7(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 8768907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular recognition in protein families: a database of aligned three-dimensional structures of related proteins.
    Overington JP; Zhu ZY; Sali A; Johnson MS; Sowdhamini R; Louie GV; Blundell TL
    Biochem Soc Trans; 1993 Aug; 21 ( Pt 3)(3):597-604. PubMed ID: 8224474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mining sequential patterns for protein fold recognition.
    Exarchos TP; Papaloukas C; Lampros C; Fotiadis DI
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):165-79. PubMed ID: 17573243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assigning folds to the proteins encoded by the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium.
    Fischer D; Eisenberg D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 Oct; 94(22):11929-34. PubMed ID: 9342339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading.
    Rost B; Schneider R; Sander C
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Jul; 270(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 9237912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast and accurate multi-class protein fold recognition with spatial sample kernels.
    Kuksa P; Huang PH; Pavlovic V
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2008; 7():133-43. PubMed ID: 19642275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of residue pairs in protein sequence-sequence and sequence-structure alignments.
    Jung J; Lee B
    Protein Sci; 2000 Aug; 9(8):1576-88. PubMed ID: 10975579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meeting review: the Second meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996.
    Dunbrack RL; Gerloff DL; Bower M; Chen X; Lichtarge O; Cohen FE
    Fold Des; 1997; 2(2):R27-42. PubMed ID: 9135979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conserved structural features in eukaryotic and prokaryotic fucosyltransferases.
    Breton C; Oriol R; Imberty A
    Glycobiology; 1998 Jan; 8(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 9451017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient recognition of protein fold at low sequence identity by conservative application of Psi-BLAST: application.
    Stevens FJ; Kuemmel C; Babnigg G; Collart FR
    J Mol Recognit; 2005; 18(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 15593246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new superfamily of protein-O-fucosyltransferases, alpha2-fucosyltransferases, and alpha6-fucosyltransferases: phylogeny and identification of conserved peptide motifs.
    Martinez-Duncker I; Mollicone R; Candelier JJ; Breton C; Oriol R
    Glycobiology; 2003 Dec; 13(12):1C-5C. PubMed ID: 12966037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.