These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8953484)

  • 1. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures.
    Cheshire PD; Hobkirk JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 23(11):782-9. PubMed ID: 8953484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy.
    Millington ND; Leung T
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 8595110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of fit in osseointegrated implant components using torque/turn analysis.
    Wicks RA; deRijk WG; Windeler AS
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Dec; 3(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 7866503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part I. The effects of tightening the gold screws and placement of a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 8603168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part 2. The effects of loading a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
    Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9171008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.
    al-Turki LE; Chai J; Lautenschlager EP; Hutten MC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11887597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal torque and force to failure of non-axially tightened implant abutment screws.
    Goldberg J; Lee T; Phark JH; Chee W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):322-326. PubMed ID: 30139673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
    Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
    Binon PP; McHugh MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
    Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relation between implant/abutment vertical misfit and torque loss of abutment screws.
    Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; das Neves FD; Fernandes Neto AJ; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 19180328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
    Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions.
    Farina AP; Spazzin AO; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 24423456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy combining different brands of implants and abutments.
    Solá-Ruíz MF; Selva-Otaolaurruchi E; Senent-Vicente G; González-de-Cossio I; Amigó-Borrás V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Mar; 18(2):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23229250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.