These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8954373)

  • 81. Initial experience with reuse of coronary angioplasty catheters in the United States.
    Browne KF; Maldonado R; Telatnik M; Vlietstra RE; Brenner AS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Dec; 30(7):1735-40. PubMed ID: 9385901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Medical-device reprocessing.
    Alfa MJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2000 Aug; 21(8):496-8. PubMed ID: 10968713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Avoid patient safety issues when utilizing reprocessed "single use" items.
    W V Med J; 2000; 96(4):503. PubMed ID: 10986921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Reprocessing single-use devices: an orthopaedic perspective.
    Sikka RS; Fischer DA; Swiontkowski MF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Feb; 87(2):450-7. PubMed ID: 15687171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Reprocessing medical devices sparks ongoing debate.
    Minim Invasive Surg Nurs; 1996; 10(3):74-9. PubMed ID: 9025478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Cleaning of instruments: an absolute requirement for successful reprocessing.
    Wilder JA; Roth K
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; Suppl():69-72. PubMed ID: 22559780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Influence of multiple reuse and resterilization cycles on the performance of a bipolar vessel sealing device (LigaSure) intended for single use.
    Kuvaldina A; Hayes G; Sumner J; Behling-Kelly E
    Vet Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(7):951-957. PubMed ID: 30180278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Immediate use steam sterilization: it's all about the process.
    Nania P
    AORN J; 2013 Jul; 98(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23806593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Chaos to comprehension: cleaning, sterilization, and disinfection.
    Young EC; Sanford TA
    Urol Nurs; 2003 Oct; 23(5):329-32, 377; quiz 333. PubMed ID: 14621354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Reuse of single-use medical devices.
    Fielder JH
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(6):80-1. PubMed ID: 10576078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Microbiological, microstructure, and material science examinations of reprocessed Combitubes after multiple reuse.
    Lipp MD; Jaehnichen G; Golecki N; Fecht G; Reichl R; Heeg P
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Sep; 91(3):693-7. PubMed ID: 10960402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Reusing medical devices. Ensuring safety the second time around.
    Lewis C
    FDA Consum; 2000; 34(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11590804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Reuse of disposables in the catheterization laboratory. Report of the committee appointed by the Cardiological Society of India.
    Indian Heart J; 1997; 49(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 9291665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Third-party reprocessing of endoscopic accessories.
    Furman PJ
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 10683223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Sterility and microbiological assessment of reused single-use cardiac electrophysiology catheters.
    Tessarolo F; Caola I; Caciagli P; Guarrera GM; Nollo G
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1385-92. PubMed ID: 17152039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Reusing disposables: same old story--more characters added.
    Ball CK; Schafer EM; Thorne D
    Insight; 1996 Sep; 21(3):77-84. PubMed ID: 8954373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. A new controversy in respiratory equipment management: reusables versus disposed disposables versus reused disposables.
    Walton JR
    Respir Care; 1986 Mar; 31(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 10315691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.