These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8954874)

  • 1. Linguistic-Numeric Presentation Mode Effects on Risky Option Preferences.
    Dusenbury R; Fennema MG
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1996 Nov; 68(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 8954874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of probability mode on preference reversal.
    González-Vallejo C; Wallsten TS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):855-64. PubMed ID: 1385620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aging and loss decision making: increased risk aversion and decreased use of maximizing information, with correlated rationality and value maximization.
    Kurnianingsih YA; Sim SK; Chee MW; Mullette-Gillman OA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():280. PubMed ID: 26029092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear decision weights or moment-based preferences? A model competition involving described and experienced skewness.
    Spiliopoulos L; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():99-123. PubMed ID: 30447519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice.
    Dickhaut J; McCabe K; Nagode JC; Rustichini A; Smith K; Pardo JV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(6):3536-41. PubMed ID: 12626760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music-evoked incidental happiness modulates probability weighting during risky lottery choices.
    Schulreich S; Heussen YG; Gerhardt H; Mohr PN; Binkofski FC; Koelsch S; Heekeren HR
    Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():981. PubMed ID: 24432007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.
    Farashahi S; Azab H; Hayden B; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4383-4398. PubMed ID: 29626169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Framing effects in choices between multioutcome life-expectancy lotteries.
    Bernstein LM; Chapman GB; Elstein AS
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(3):324-38. PubMed ID: 10424839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field.
    Dimmock SG; Kouwenberg R; Mitchell OS; Peijnenburg K
    J Risk Uncertain; 2015 Dec; 51(3):219-244. PubMed ID: 26924890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of information search and its influence on risk preferences.
    Kopsacheilis O
    Theory Decis; 2018; 84(3):311-339. PubMed ID: 31258207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-Affirmation Reduces Uncertainty Aversion for Potential Gains.
    Weller JA; Vineyard J; Klein WMP
    J Appl Soc Psychol; 2022 May; 52(5):277-286. PubMed ID: 35937756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronized Incidental Affect Changes Ambiguity Preferences.
    Sambrano D; Dong B; Glimcher P; Phelps EA
    Res Sq; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38352488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments.
    Chew SH; Li KK; Chark R; Zhong S
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 2008; 20():179-201. PubMed ID: 19552309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference.
    Dohmen T; Falk A; Huffman D; Sunde U
    J Econ Perspect; 2018; 32(2):115-34. PubMed ID: 30203932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences.
    Stillman PE; Krajbich I; Ferguson MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(50):31738-31747. PubMed ID: 33234567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic Decisions with Ambiguous Outcome Magnitudes Vary with Low and High Stakes but Not Trait Anxiety or Depression.
    Zbozinek TD; Charpentier CJ; Qi S; Mobbs D
    Comput Psychiatr; 2021; 5(1):119-139. PubMed ID: 38773996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospect theory in the health domain: a quantitative assessment.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB; I'Haridon O
    J Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 24103499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries
    Bougherara D; Friesen L; Nauges C
    J Risk Uncertain; 2021; 62(1):89-112. PubMed ID: 33967390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference-Point Theory: An Account of Individual Differences in Risk Preferences.
    Mellers BA; Yin S
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Sep; ():17456916231190393. PubMed ID: 37707492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divergence and Convergence of Risky Decision Making Across Prospective Gains and Losses: Preferences and Strategies.
    Kurnianingsih YA; Mullette-Gillman OA
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():457. PubMed ID: 26733779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.