126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8955256)
1. US drops patent claim to Hagahai cell line.
Lehrman S
Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6609):500. PubMed ID: 8955256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anthropologist cleared in patent dispute.
Lehrman S
Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6573):374. PubMed ID: 8602228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientists attacked for 'patenting' Pacific tribe.
Taubes G
Science; 1995 Nov; 270(5239):1112. PubMed ID: 7502030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can ELSI's principles inform consensus?
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Jun; 14(6):677. PubMed ID: 9630964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patenting of human genes, cells and parts of the body? -- the ethical dimensions of patent law.
Moufang R
IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1994; 25(4):487-515. PubMed ID: 11660161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The West knows best?
Crigger BJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(2):50. PubMed ID: 11644808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH wins patent on basic technique covering all ex vivo gene therapy.
Gavaghan H
Nature; 1995 Mar; 374(6521):393. PubMed ID: 7700334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Breakthrough stirs US embryo debate..
Butler D
Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6707):104. PubMed ID: 9823879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Human Genome Project and patents.
Science; 1991 Dec; 254(5039):1710, 1712. PubMed ID: 1763316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The price of profit.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 1998 May; 158(2134):20-1. PubMed ID: 11660513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patenting gene fragments.
Agrawal A
Econ Polit Wkly; 1993 May; 28(22):1089-93. PubMed ID: 11660270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conferring a federal property right in genetic material: stepping into the future with the Genetic Privacy Act.
Lin MM
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):109-34. PubMed ID: 8819598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sweeping patent shocks gene therapists.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 1995 Apr; 146(1971):4. PubMed ID: 11656409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A search for limits.
Woodward KL
Newsweek; 1993 Feb; 121(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 11645224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Still strict on stem cells.
Wadman M
Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7241):950-1. PubMed ID: 19396105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patent and be damned!
Sheppard J
Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Jan; No. 124():16-7. PubMed ID: 11655051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patent law and human genome research at the crossroads: the need for Congressional action.
McKay DL
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1994; 10(2):465-98. PubMed ID: 16514752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human tissue research: who owns the results?
Wagner AB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1987 Jun; 69(6):329-52. PubMed ID: 11649984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH drops bid for gene patents.
Anderson C
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5149):909-10. PubMed ID: 8310287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should genes be patented? The gene patenting controversy: legal, ethical, and policy foundations of an international agreement.
Looney B
Law Policy Int Bus; 1994; 26(1):231-72. PubMed ID: 11979605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
