These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8956300)

  • 1. Agreement between the classical urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification: importance of urea rebound.
    Bosticardo GM; Alloatti S
    Nephron; 1996; 74(4):674-9. PubMed ID: 8956300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a modified urea kinetic model direct dialysis quantification and classic urea kinetic modeling.
    Bosticardo GM; Avalle U; Giacchino F; Alloatti S
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(3):M798-800. PubMed ID: 8573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Proposal of new formulas for three-point urea kinetics, compared with traditional kinetics and direct dialysis quantification].
    Bosticardo GM; Avalle U; Serra A; Giacchino F; Molino A; Alloatti S
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 1996 Mar; 48(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 8848772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of an on-line urea monitor compared with urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification.
    Bosticardo GM; Avalle U; Giacchino F; Molino A; Alloatti S
    ASAIO J; 1994; 40(3):M426-30. PubMed ID: 8555551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitating hemodialysis: a comparison of three kinetic models.
    Flanigan MJ; Fangman J; Lim VS
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1991 Mar; 17(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 1996572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of adequacy of dialysis in a selected population on CAPD for over 3 years: the influence of urea and creatinine kinetics.
    Selgas R; Bajo MA; Fernandez-Reyes MJ; Bosque E; Lopez-Revuelta K; Jimenez C; Borrego F; de Alvaro F
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1993; 8(11):1244-53. PubMed ID: 8302464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Urea kinetic model analysis in dialysis: from theory to practice].
    Canaud B; Garred LJ; Mion C
    Nephrologie; 1991; 12(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 1922652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Urea kinetic modelling--are any of the 'bedside' Kt/V formulae reliable enough?
    Covic A; Goldsmith DJ; Hill K; Venning MC; Ackrill P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3138-46. PubMed ID: 9870479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of using 30-minute post-dialysis BUN to determine equilibrated Kt/V.
    Chirananthavat T; Tungsanga K; Eiam-Ong S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89 Suppl 2():S54-64. PubMed ID: 17044455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Urea distribution volume and ionic dialysance].
    Pozzoni P; Pozzi M; Di Filippo S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S226-30. PubMed ID: 15750991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Kt/V estimations in high-flux haemodiafiltration using per cent reduction of urea: incorporation of urea rebound.
    Kerr PG; Argilés A; Canaud B; Flavier JL; Mion CM
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1993; 8(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 8384336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percent reduction in blood urea concentration during dialysis estimates Kt/V in a simple and accurate way.
    Basile C; Casino F; Lopez T
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1990 Jan; 15(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 2294732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of postdialysis urea rebound on the quantification of pediatric hemodialysis.
    Marsenić O; Pavlicić D; Bigović G; Peco-Antić A; Jovanović O
    Nephron; 2000 Feb; 84(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 10657712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconciliation between urea kinetics and direct dialysis quantification.
    Casino FG; Gaudiano V; Santarsia G; Ambrosecchia R; Mostacci SD; Bagnato C; Lopez T
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1992; 7(10):1007-12. PubMed ID: 1331874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy.
    Lindley EJ; Chamney PW; Wuepper A; Ingles H; Tattersall JE; Will EJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Jan; 24(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 18697799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mathematical modelling of haemodialysis in children.
    Evans JH; Smye SW; Brocklebank JT
    Pediatr Nephrol; 1992 Jul; 6(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 1498004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On-line dialysate urea monitor: comparison with urea kinetics.
    Alloatti S; Molino A; Manes M; Bonfant G; Bosticardo GM
    Int J Artif Organs; 1995 Sep; 18(9):548-52. PubMed ID: 8582774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of decisions regarding hemodialysis patients by urea kinetic modeling.
    Buur T; Timpka T
    Med Decis Making; 1990; 10(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 2233157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quest for postdialysis urea rebound-equilibrated Kt/V with only intradialytic urea samples.
    Jean G; Charra B; Chazot C; Laurent G
    Kidney Int; 1999 Sep; 56(3):1149-53. PubMed ID: 10469385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient.
    Kloppenburg WD; Stegeman CA; Hooyschuur M; van der Ven J; de Jong PE; Huisman RM
    Kidney Int; 1999 May; 55(5):1961-9. PubMed ID: 10231460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.