BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8956574)

  • 21. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography.
    Guibaud L; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M; Barkun AN
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7568807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography.
    Soto JA; Velez SM; Guzmán J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):943-8. PubMed ID: 10587126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
    Holzknecht N; Gauger J; Sackmann M; Thoeni RF; Schurig J; Holl J; Weinzierl M; Helmberger T; Paumgartner G; Reiser M
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 9494483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The value of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the expedient diagnosis of choledocholithiasis].
    Mussack T; Ladurner R; Rock C; Trupka A; Gross M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Apr; 127(15):786-90. PubMed ID: 11951135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined use of endosonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the same session.
    Unsal B; Alper E; Baydar B; Aslan F; Akpinar Z; Buyraç Z; Aksöz MK
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2011 Feb; 22(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21480112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography.
    Soto JA; Alvarez O; Múnera F; Velez SM; Valencia J; Ramírez N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1127-34. PubMed ID: 11000177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients.
    Vitellas KM; El-Dieb A; Vaswani KK; Bennett WF; Fromkes J; Ellison C; Bova JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 12130442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Diagnosis of common bile duct stones in symptomatic gallstone disease].
    Kristiansen VB; Rosenberg J; Kehlet H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jul; 162(31):4134-9. PubMed ID: 10962913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity of ultrasonography in the demonstration of common bile duct stones and its ranking in comparison with intravenous cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Myllylä V; Päivänsalo M; Pyhtinen J; Kairaluoma MI; Niemelä S
    Rofo; 1984 Aug; 141(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 6431543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single-shot MR cholangiography versus intravenous cholangiography.
    Reuther G; Kiefer B; Tuchmann A
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):561-6. PubMed ID: 8596866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparison of single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences.
    Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; McEntee G; MacMathuna P; Stack JP; Murray JG
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Nov; 55(11):866-73. PubMed ID: 11069743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique.
    Macaulay SE; Schulte SJ; Sekijima JH; Obregon RG; Simon HE; Rohrmann CA; Freeny PC; Schmiedl UP
    Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 7784572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Diagnosis of common bile duct stones by MR imaging, mainly MR cholangiopancreatography].
    Isomoto I; Koshiishi T; Fukuda T; Hayashi K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Sep; 58(11):566-71. PubMed ID: 9796263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biliary stones and stenoses: diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiography.
    Tekin A; Saygili M; Hafta A; Oztan S
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2002 Sep; 13(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 16378295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis by magnetic resonance cholangiogram.
    Hussein FM; Alsumait B; Aman S; Sinan T; Alkandari K; da Hniya MH; Alsaeed O
    Australas Radiol; 2002 Mar; 46(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11966585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Neitlich JD; Topazian M; Smith RC; Gupta A; Burrell MI; Rosenfield AT
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 9169700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Becker CD; Grossholz M; Becker M; Mentha G; de Peyer R; Terrier F
    Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):523-30. PubMed ID: 9356639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies.
    Polkowski M; Regula J; Tilszer A; Butruk E
    Endoscopy; 2007 Apr; 39(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 17427065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.