354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8956574)
41. MR cholangiography of late biliary complications after liver transplantation.
Laghi A; Pavone P; Catalano C; Rossi M; Panebianco V; Alfani D; Passariello R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1541-6. PubMed ID: 10350286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced spiral CT, US, and ERCP.
Pickuth D; Spielmann RP
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(36):1514-7. PubMed ID: 11148990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Gross BH; Harter LP; Gore RM; Callen PW; Filly RA; Shapiro HA; Goldberg HI
Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):471-4. PubMed ID: 6849097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones.
Laokpessi A; Bouillet P; Sautereau D; Cessot F; Desport JC; Le Sidaner A; Pillegand B
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Aug; 96(8):2354-9. PubMed ID: 11513174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Dwerryhouse SJ; Brown E; Vipond MN
Br J Surg; 1998 Oct; 85(10):1364-6. PubMed ID: 9782014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: value of using the half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequence.
Ho JT; Yap CK
Ann Acad Med Singap; 1999 May; 28(3):366-70. PubMed ID: 10575520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [MR-cholangiography in patients suspected with choledochus calculi].
Lundorf E; Sørensen JS; Wara P; Kruse A
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Apr; 162(17):2436-8. PubMed ID: 10835970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing hepatolithiasis.
Sugiyama M; Atomi Y; Takahara T; Hachiya J
Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(40):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11490809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography.
Fulcher AS; Turner MA
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 10352596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children.
Miyazaki T; Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Tsuchigame T; Takahashi M; Sera Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9423593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Biliary complications of liver transplant. Role of cholangiography with magnetic resonance].
Laghi A; Pavone P; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Messina A; Lobina L; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1998; 95(1-2):66-71. PubMed ID: 9636730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bile duct strictures after hepatobiliary surgery: assessment with MR cholangiography.
Ward J; Sheridan MB; Guthrie JA; Davies MH; Millson CE; Lodge JP; Pollard SG; Prasad KR; Toogood GJ; Robinson PJ
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 14990819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Intraductal ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones: a comparative study.
Linghu EQ; Cheng LF; Wang XD; Wang ZQ; Yang YS; Li W; Cai FC; Wang HZ; Du H; Meng JY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2004 Feb; 3(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 14969855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of MR cholangiopancreatographic techniques with contrast-enhanced cholangiography in the evaluation of sclerosing cholangitis.
Vitellas KM; Enns RA; Keogan MT; Freed KS; Spritzer CE; Baillie J; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 11804887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Detectability and appearance of bile duct calculus on MR imaging of the abdomen using axial T1- and T2-weighted sequences.
Chan YL; Lam WW; Metreweli C; Chung SC
Clin Radiol; 1997 May; 52(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 9171788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Bile duct leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: value of contrast-enhanced MRCP.
Aduna M; Larena JA; Martín D; Martínez-Guereñu B; Aguirre I; Astigarraga E
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(4):480-7. PubMed ID: 15688109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diagnosis of common bile duct calculi with intraductal ultrasonography during endoscopic biliary cannulation.
Kubota Y; Takaoka M; Yamamoto S; Shibatani N; Shimatani M; Takamido S; Imai Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2002 Jun; 17(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 12100618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Value of three-dimensional gradient-echo magnetic resonance cholangiography in diagnosing choledocholithiasis.
Rawat B; Loewy J
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Aug; 47(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 8696993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The role of 99mTc mebrofenin hepatobiliary scanning in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease.
Iqbal M; Aggarwal S; Kumar R; Garg PK; Bandhu S; Kumar A; Parshad R; Guleria S
Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Mar; 25(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 15094448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
