These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8956712)
1. Contraceptive implants: long acting and provider dependent contraception raises concerns about freedom of choice. Thompson MS BMJ; 1996 Nov; 313(7069):1393-5. PubMed ID: 8956712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Depo-Provera--ethical issues in its testing and distribution. Potts M; Paxman JM J Med Ethics; 1984 Mar; 10(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 6231379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) for contraception in adolescent mothers. Polaneczky M; Slap G; Forke C; Rappaport A; Sondheimer S N Engl J Med; 1994 Nov; 331(18):1201-6. PubMed ID: 7935659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results. Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Contraception on trial. Frank ML; DiMaria C Drug Saf; 1997 Dec; 17(6):360-8. PubMed ID: 9429835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Coverdale JH; Bayer TL; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4. PubMed ID: 8354506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan. Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitudes towards contraceptive implants and injectables among present and former users in Singapore. Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS J Biosoc Sci; 1990 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2105323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. NORPLANT contraceptive implants advancing. Segal SJ Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 12279797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contraceptive introduction and the management of choice: the role of Cyclofem in Indonesia. Simmons R; Fajans P; Lubis F Contraception; 1994 May; 49(5):509-25. PubMed ID: 8045135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal. Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New contraceptives by the year 2000: promise and challenge. Rinehart W Asian Pac Popul Programme News; 1984 Dec; 13(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 12313700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interest in Norplant escalates as UK launch approaches. Fam Plann Today; 1993; ():2. PubMed ID: 12287164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Research, introduction, and use: advancing from Norplant. Harrison PF; Rosenfield A Contraception; 1998 Dec; 58(6):323-34. PubMed ID: 10095968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of patient counseling on acceptance of the levonorgestrel implant contraceptive in the United Kingdom. Davie JE; Walling MR; Mansour DJ; Bromham D; Kishen M; Fowler P Clin Ther; 1996; 18(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 8851460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The attitudes of clinic staff as factors in women's selection of Norplant implants for their contraception. Frank ML; Bateman L; Poindexter AN Women Health; 1994; 21(4):75-88. PubMed ID: 7941612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The development of contraceptive technologies: a feminist critique. Hardon A Focus Gend; 1994 Jun; 2(2):40-4. PubMed ID: 12345531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]