162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8956968)
1. Clinical application of visual evoked fields using an MRI-linked whole head MEG system.
Nakasato N; Seki K; Fujita S; Hatanaka K; Kawamura T; Ohtomo S; Kanno A; Ikeda H; Yoshimoto T
Front Med Biol Eng; 1996; 7(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 8956968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neuromagnetic evidence that the P100 component of the pattern reversal visual evoked response originates in the bottom of the calcarine fissure.
Seki K; Nakasato N; Fujita S; Hatanaka K; Kawamura T; Kanno A; Yoshimoto T
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 100(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 8893661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study of the visual evoked magnetic field with the m-sequence technique.
Tabuchi H; Yokoyama T; Shimogawara M; Shiraki K; Nagasaka E; Miki T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 43(6):2045-54. PubMed ID: 12037017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Postoperative normalization of prolonged P100m latency in the visual evoked magnetic field in a patient with occipital meningioma].
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Seki K; Hatanaka K; Mizoi K; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1997 Apr; 49(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 9125747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MEG recording from the human ventro-occipital cortex in response to isoluminant color stimulation.
Kuriki I; Sadamoto K; Takeda T
Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 16079004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mapping of evoked magnetic field with visual stimulation: a secondary projection and processing area.
Miyamoto A; Wilson GF
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Jul; 62(7):638-47. PubMed ID: 1898299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occipital lobe lesions result in a displacement of magnetoencephalography visual evoked field dipoles.
Pang EW; Chu BH; Otsubo H
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 31(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 25271686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: a study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145.
Shigeto H; Tobimatsu S; Yamamoto T; Kobayashi T; Kato M
J Neurol Sci; 1998 Apr; 156(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 9588856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings.
Brecelj J; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Hoshiyama M
Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 9562544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low- and high-frequency evoked responses following pattern reversal stimuli: a MEG study supported by fMRI constraint.
Perfetti B; Franciotti R; Della Penna S; Ferretti A; Caulo M; Romani GL; Onofrj M
Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1152-67. PubMed ID: 17337346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Whole head measurement of auditory evoked magnetic field using a MR-linked helmet shaped MEG system].
Nakasato N; Seki K; Kawamura T; Fujita S; Matani A; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1994 Jul; 46(7):632-7. PubMed ID: 7946618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia.
Watanabe K; Shinoda K; Kimura I; Mashima Y; Oguchi Y; Ohde H
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 17184719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Locating the central sulcus using three dimensional image fusion system of helmet shaped whole head MEG and MRI].
Kawamura T; Nakasato N; Seki K; Shimizu H; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
No Shinkei Geka; 1994 Aug; 22(8):737-41. PubMed ID: 8072631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ocular dominance affects magnitude of dipole moment: an MEG study.
Shima H; Hasegawa M; Tachibana O; Nomura M; Yamashita J; Ozaki Y; Kawai J; Higuchi M; Kado H
Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(12):817-21. PubMed ID: 20613677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study.
Di Russo F; Aprile T; Spitoni G; Spinelli D
Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):842-54. PubMed ID: 18024488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined three-dimensional anisotropy contrast imaging and magnetoencephalography guidance to preserve visual function in a patient with an occipital lobe tumor.
Inoue T; Fujimura M; Kumabe T; Nakasato N; Higano S; Tominaga T
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2004 Aug; 47(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 15346325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the primary visual cortex: evaluation of human afferent visual system.
Miki A; Nakajima T; Fujita M; Wantanabe H; Kuwabara T; Naruse S; Takagi M; Abe H
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1995; 39(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8577083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human cortical response to various apparent motions: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Tanaka E; Noguchi Y; Kakigi R; Kaneoke Y
Neurosci Res; 2007 Oct; 59(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 17651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An FMRI investigation of the cortical network underlying detection and categorization abilities in hemianopic patients.
Perez C; Peyrin C; Cavézian C; Coubard O; Caetta F; Raz N; Levin N; Doucet G; Andersson F; Obadia M; Gout O; Héran F; Savatovsky J; Chokron S
Brain Topogr; 2013 Apr; 26(2):264-77. PubMed ID: 22878845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
