These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8957133)

  • 21. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage and marginal placement of a glass-ionomer liner.
    Holtan JR; Nystrom GP; Douglas WH; Phelps RA
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Feb; 21(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 2197659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microleakage in the sandwich technique.
    Mount GJ; Papageorgiou A; Makinson OF
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 1290608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
    Browning WD; Safirstein J
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of three glass ionomer cement bases.
    Scherer W; Kaim JM; Lippman N; Tagliani T; Cooper H
    Am J Dent; 1989 Apr; 2(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 2604961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: a comparison of three in vitro procedures.
    al-Obaidi FF; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 9161211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz UB
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9545918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations.
    Moazzami SM; Sarabi N; Hajizadeh H; Majidinia S; Li Y; Meharry MR; Shahrokh H
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 24151926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin.
    Owens BM; Halter TK; Brown DM
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 9728146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.