260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8957608)
1. Differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions using "quantitative" parameters of FDG PET images.
Hübner KF; Buonocore E; Gould HR; Thie J; Smith GT; Stephens S; Dickey J
Clin Nucl Med; 1996 Dec; 21(12):941-9. PubMed ID: 8957608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of pulmonary lesions with low F-18 FDG uptake using double phase F-18 FDG PET/CT: comparison of visual and quantitative analyses.
Kim IJ; Kim SJ; Kim YS; Lee TH; Jeong YJ
Neoplasma; 2009; 56(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19152243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Respiratory-gated imaging in metabolic evaluation of small solitary pulmonary nodules: 18F-FDG PET/CT and correlation with histology.
Farid K; Poullias X; Alifano M; Regnard JF; Servois V; Caillat-Vigneron N; Petras S
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jul; 36(7):722-7. PubMed ID: 25793929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography for evaluation of indeterminate lung nodules: assigning a probability of malignancy may be preferable to binary readings.
Kim SC; Machac J; Krynyckyi BR; Knesaurek K; Krellenstein D; Schultz B; Gribetz A; DePalo L; Teirstein A; Kim CK
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 22(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 18498030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic efficacy of PET-FDG imaging in solitary pulmonary nodules. Potential role in evaluation and management.
Dewan NA; Gupta NC; Redepenning LS; Phalen JJ; Frick MP
Chest; 1993 Oct; 104(4):997-1002. PubMed ID: 8404239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of PET for diagnosis of solid pulmonary lesions with 18F-FDG uptake below the standardized uptake value of 2.5.
Hashimoto Y; Tsujikawa T; Kondo C; Maki M; Momose M; Nagai A; Ohnuki T; Nishikawa T; Kusakabe K
J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 16513611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Positron emission tomography using 18-FDG-PET in radiologically indeterminate pulmonary lesions].
Ruiz-Hernández G; de Juan R; Samanes A; Verea H; Peñas JM; Veres A; Lapeña L; Montz R; Carreras JL
An Med Interna; 2004 Jan; 21(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15195479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.
Matthies A; Hickeson M; Cuchiara A; Alavi A
J Nucl Med; 2002 Jul; 43(7):871-5. PubMed ID: 12097455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The maximum standardized uptake values on integrated FDG-PET/CT is useful in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.
Bryant AS; Cerfolio RJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):1016-20. PubMed ID: 16928527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant lung/mediastinal lesions.
Gupta N; Gill H; Graeber G; Bishop H; Hurst J; Stephens T
Chest; 1998 Oct; 114(4):1105-11. PubMed ID: 9792584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET.
Hickeson M; Yun M; Matthies A; Zhuang H; Adam LE; Lacorte L; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Dec; 29(12):1639-47. PubMed ID: 12458399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Likelihood of malignancy in a solitary pulmonary nodule: comparison of Bayesian analysis and results of FDG-PET scan.
Dewan NA; Shehan CJ; Reeb SD; Gobar LS; Scott WJ; Ryschon K
Chest; 1997 Aug; 112(2):416-22. PubMed ID: 9266877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET.
Yang SN; Liang JA; Lin FJ; Kwan AS; Kao CH; Shen YY
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(6A):4153-7. PubMed ID: 11911310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT.
Christensen JA; Nathan MA; Mullan BP; Hartman TE; Swensen SJ; Lowe VJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1361-7. PubMed ID: 17056930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in sensitivity with delayed imaging of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET.
Núñez R; Kalapparambath A; Varela J
Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2007; 26(4):196-207. PubMed ID: 17662186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of chest masses by FDG positron emission tomography.
Hübner KF; Buonocore E; Singh SK; Gould HR; Cotten DW
Clin Nucl Med; 1995 Apr; 20(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 7788982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can dynamic imaging, using
Marin A; Murchison JT; Skwarski KM; Tavares AAS; Fletcher A; Wallace WA; Salapura V; van Beek EJR; Mirsadraee S
Radiol Oncol; 2021 May; 55(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 34051709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules with an initial standard uptake value less than 2.5.
Chen CJ; Lee BF; Yao WJ; Cheng L; Wu PS; Chu CL; Chiu NT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):475-9. PubMed ID: 18647920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PET-FDG imaging and transthoracic needle lung aspiration biopsy in evaluation of pulmonary lesions. A comparative risk-benefit analysis.
Dewan NA; Reeb SD; Gupta NC; Gobar LS; Scott WJ
Chest; 1995 Aug; 108(2):441-6. PubMed ID: 7634881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.
Miwa K; Inubushi M; Wagatsuma K; Nagao M; Murata T; Koyama M; Koizumi M; Sasaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 24418285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
