These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8957637)
1. 1- versus 2- and 3-day diagnostic patch testing. Manuskiatti W; Maibach HI Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Oct; 35(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 8957637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of contact dermatitis using the TRUE patch test. Wright RW J Ark Med Soc; 1991 Nov; 88(6):271-2. PubMed ID: 1800484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six-hour versus 48-hour patch testing with varying concentrations of potassium dichromate. Kosann MK; Brancaccio RR; Shupack JL; Franks AG; Cohen DE Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 9601909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic patch testing: the other kind of patch test. Jackson EM Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 9810026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of vehicles in diagnostic patch testing. A reappraisal. Tanglertsampan C; Maibach HI Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Oct; 29(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8281777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left-versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Brasch J; Henseler T; Aberer W; Bäuerle G; Frosch PJ; Fuchs T; Fünfstück V; Kaiser G; Lischka GG; Pilz B J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Oct; 31(4):584-91. PubMed ID: 8089284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using a nonadherent transparent scribing sheet: tip for allergen location in pediatric contact dermatitis testing. Admani S; Jacob SE Pediatr Dermatol; 2014; 31(3):410-1. PubMed ID: 24387741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicentre patch testing with methylisothiazolinone by the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Isaksson M; Andersen KE; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; Gruvberger B; Johansen JD; Maibach HI; Rustemeyer T; Le Coz CJ; White IR; Bruze M Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 24731088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chamber test versus patch test for epicutaneous testing. Pirilä V Contact Dermatitis; 1975; 1(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 1235071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber patch tests in 220 consecutive patients. Lindelöf B Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):288-9. PubMed ID: 2383987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reproducibility of epicutaneous test results]. Szliska C; Rakoski J Z Hautkr; 1988; 63 Suppl 4():67-9. PubMed ID: 2978100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic patch test concentration for Kathon CG. Maibach HI Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 4085223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The art of patch testing. Fischer T Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Oct; 23(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 2073780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch Test Negative Generalized Dermatitis. Spiker A; Mowad C Dermatitis; 2016; 27(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 27608062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antigen preparation for the patch test. Fischer T; Maibach HI Occup Med; 1986; 1(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 3303375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]