BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8957785)

  • 1. Craniofacial osseointegration: technique for bar and acrylic resin substructure construction for auricular prostheses.
    Wolfaardt JF; Coss P; Levesque R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 8957785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rehabilitation with ear prosthesis linked to osseointegrated implants.
    Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Moreno A
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 22612825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prosthesis auricular with osseointegrated implants and quality of life.
    dos Santos DM; Goiato MC; Pesqueira AA; Bannwart LC; Rezende MC; Magro-Filho O; Moreno A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 20061968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified technique for retaining silicone auricular prosthesis: a case report.
    Nelogi SY; Chandrashekhar NH; Porwal A; Guttal SS
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 19(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 21780728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevention of peri-implant skin inflammation using an acrylic resin housing with a tunnel design for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Phan HH; Chotprasert N; Shakya P; Srithavaj MLT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):437-441. PubMed ID: 28159347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simplified approach for the rehabilitation of an auricular defect: a case report.
    Singh SK; Goel K; Mishra N; Chand P; Pal U; Tripathi S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 24311365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Closed-field titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses.
    Alvi R; McPhail J; Hancock K
    Br J Plast Surg; 2002 Dec; 55(8):668-70. PubMed ID: 12550121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fabrication of a craniofacial implant surgical and treatment planning guide.
    Alfano SG; Robinson RF; Webber CM; Erickson KK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 15624004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: a clinical challenge.
    Arora V; Sahoo NK; Gopi A; Saini DK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 26792146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation.
    Vijverberg MA; Verhamme L; van de Pol P; Kunst HPM; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 276(4):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 30847547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidisciplinary treatment for an implant retained auricular prosthesis rehabilitation.
    Wright RF; Wazen JJ; Asher ES; Evans JH
    N Y State Dent J; 1999; 65(7):26-31. PubMed ID: 10500406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A surgical guide for craniofacial implant placement for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Ozçelik TB; Tanner PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 20362769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self retentive partial silicone auricular prosthesis: a case report.
    Patil PG; Tagore M; Jaiswal N; Puri S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Jun; 20(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 22852524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fabrication of an educational model for patients considering prostheses retained by osseointegrated implants.
    Morrison DC; Kubon TM; Anderson J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):679-83. PubMed ID: 12131892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Osseointegrated implant-supported and magnetically retained ear prosthesis: a clinical report.
    McCartney JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jul; 66(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 1941677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term study of quality and safety of osseointegration for the retention of auricular prostheses.
    Westin T; Tjellström A; Hammerlid E; Bergström K; Rangert B
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Jul; 121(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 10388896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
    Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant retained auricular prosthesis with a modified hader bar: a case report.
    Lovely M; Dathan PC; Gopal D; George BT; Chandrasekharan Nair K
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Jun; 14(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 24757357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention and load transfer characteristics of implant-retained auricular prostheses.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Baba T; Caputo AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 17622002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical evaluation of craniofacial osseointegration retention systems.
    Del Valle V; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J; Rangert B; Tan HK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 7672853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.