These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8957789)

  • 21. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of stress distribution and flexion among various designs of bar attachments for implant overdentures: a three dimensional finite element analysis.
    Prakash V; D'Souza M; Adhikari R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 19336857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
    Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments.
    Manju V; Sreelal T
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 22891704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Space requirements for implant-retained bar-and-clip overdentures.
    Phillips K; Wong KM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Jun; 22(6):516-8, 520, 522. PubMed ID: 11913302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cement-retained bar attachment system for implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Ozcelik TB; Ozcelik O; Pektas ZO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 17547953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An overview of the Lew attachment: clinical reports.
    Piermatti J; Winkler S
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 12498431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
    Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mandibular two-implant-retained overdenture: prosthetic design and fabrication protocol.
    Shor A; Goto Y; Shor K
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Feb; 28(2):80-8; quiz 89, 101. PubMed ID: 17319179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implant overdentures: bar versus ball attachment for mandibular implant supported overdentures--a randomised clinical trial.
    SADJ; 2004 Feb; 59(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 15106482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Wahab LA; Sadig W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 19149068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A 2-year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C; Ozbek EN
    J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 17209784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.