These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8957830)

  • 21. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year.
    Meiers JC; Turner EW
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9610330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Alavi M; Alavi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.
    Youngson CC; Holguin SM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
    Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Varnish application technique and microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A; Cardash HS; Liberman R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Apr; 6(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 8397984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Microleakage of four different amalgam binding systems].
    Oberholzer TG; Grobler SR; Rossouw RJ; van Wyk Kotze TJ; Grobler-Rabie A
    SADJ; 2001 Feb; 56(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 16894691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage in alloy-glass ionomer lined amalgam restorations after thermocycling.
    Arcoria CJ; Fisher MA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 2051252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz UB
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9545918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Liner and light exposure: effect on in-vitro Class V microleakage.
    Svizero Nda R; D'Alpino PH; da Silva e Souza MH; de Carvalho RM
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 15986952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Jesen ME
    Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 2076235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.