These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8957920)

  • 21. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
    Ayad MF; Fahmy NZ; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Support of occlusal enamel provided by bonded restorations.
    Grisanti LP; Troendle KB; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 14753332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scanning electronic microscopic analysis of the local effects of a periodontal scaling gel on selected surfaces.
    Barkmeier WW; Jabro MH; Latta MA
    J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(2):39-42. PubMed ID: 1524683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of a paste-free prophylaxis polishing cup and various prophylaxis polishing pastes on tooth enamel and restorative materials.
    Covey DA; Barnes C; Watanabe H; Johnson WW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):466-73; quiz 474-5. PubMed ID: 22313918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials.
    Francisconi LF; Honório HM; Rios D; Magalhães AC; Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18435196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of elevated temperatures on various restorative materials: an in vitro study.
    Bose RS; Mohan B; Lakshminarayanan L
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 16372794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Round robin test: wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators - supplement to the round robin test of 2005.
    Heintze SD; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):e1-9. PubMed ID: 20888629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study.
    Bagheri R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 17207080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material.
    Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term in-vivo effect of various restorative materials on enamel and dentin of primary molars.
    Mass E; Hassan A; Zilberman U
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(8):633-638. PubMed ID: 28681046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.