146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 895829)
1. Comparative recoveries of airborne fungus spores by viable and non-viable modes of volumetric collection.
Burge HP; Boise JR; Rutherford JA; Solomon WR
Mycopathologia; 1977 Jul; 61(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 895829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monitoring and assessment of airborne fungi in Kolkata, India, by viable and non-viable air sampling methods.
Das S; Gupta-Bhattacharya S
Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Aug; 184(8):4671-84. PubMed ID: 21915605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations.
Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relation of indoor and outdoor airborne fungal spore levels in the Kansas City metropolitan area.
Jara D; Portnoy J; Dhar M; Barnes C
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2017 Mar; 38(2):130-135. PubMed ID: 28234050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Air-spore in Cartagena, Spain: viable and non-viable sampling methods.
Elvira-Rendueles B; Moreno J; Garcia-Sanchez A; Vergara N; Martinez-Garcia MJ; Moreno-Grau S
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2013; 20(4):664-71. PubMed ID: 24364431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):724-34. PubMed ID: 18780236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intradiurnal variation of predominant airborne fungal spore biopollutants in the Central European urban environment.
Ščevková J; Hrabovský M; Kováč J; Rosa S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34603-34612. PubMed ID: 31654304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Airborne fungi spores distribution in various locations in Lagos, Nigeria.
Odebode A; Adekunle A; Stajich J; Adeonipekun P
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jan; 192(2):87. PubMed ID: 31900675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aerometric study of viable fungus spores in an animal care facility.
Burge HA; Solomon WR; Williams P
Lab Anim; 1979 Oct; 13(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 119110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Atmospheric concentration of fungus spores in Ankara and the effect of meteorological factors in 2003 period].
Ceter T; Pinar NM
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2009 Oct; 43(4):627-38. PubMed ID: 20084916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mould spores and yeasts in outdoor air.
Rantio-Lehtimäki A
Allergy; 1985; 40 Suppl 3():17-20. PubMed ID: 4083413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fungal spore content of the air in Munich (author's transl)].
Stix E
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Jan; 119(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 403426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Annual variation of fungal spores in atmosphere of Porto: 2003.
Oliveira M; Ribeiro H; Abreu I
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2005; 12(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 16457491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seasonal incidence of airborne fungal allergens in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Suwaine AS; Bahkali AH; Hasnain SM
Mycopathologia; 1999; 145(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10560624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Airborne and allergenic fungal spores of the Karachi environment and their correlation with meteorological factors.
Hasnain SM; Akhter T; Waqar MA
J Environ Monit; 2012 Mar; 14(3):1006-13. PubMed ID: 22327332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thirty-four identifiable airborne fungal spores in Havana, Cuba.
Almaguer M; Aira MJ; Rodríguez-Rajo FJ; Fernandez-Gonzalez M; Rojas-Flores TI
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2015; 22(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 26094511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Main airborne Ascomycota spores: characterization by culture, spore morphology, ribosomal DNA sequences and enzymatic analysis.
Oliveira M; Amorim MI; Ferreira E; Delgado L; Abreu I
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Apr; 86(4):1171-81. PubMed ID: 20143229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating fungal populations by genera/species on wide body commercial passenger aircraft and in airport terminals.
McKernan LT; Burge H; Wallingford KM; Hein MJ; Herrick R
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Apr; 51(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 17351266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of allergenically significant fungal aerosol in a rural bakery of West Bengal, India.
Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
Mycopathologia; 2000 Jan; 149(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 11227852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Atmospheric Fungal Spore Concentrations between Two Main Cities in the Caribbean Basin.
Rivera-Mariani FE; Almaguer M; Aira MJ; Bolaños-Rosero B
P R Health Sci J; 2020 Sep; 39(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 33031690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
