124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8958618)
1. Chondromalacia patellae: an in vitro study. Comparison of MR criteria with histologic and macroscopic findings.
van Leersum M; Schweitzer ME; Gannon F; Finkel G; Vinitski S; Mitchell DG
Skeletal Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(8):727-32. PubMed ID: 8958618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography.
Gagliardi JA; Chung EM; Chandnani VP; Kesling KL; Christensen KP; Null RN; Radvany MG; Hansen MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 8079858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chondromalacia patellae: diagnosis with MR imaging.
McCauley TR; Kier R; Lynch KJ; Jokl P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 1727333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of axial T1 spin-echo and T1 fat-saturation magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the diagnosis of chondromalacia patellae.
Vanarthos WJ; Pope TL; Monu JU
Orthop Rev; 1994 Dec; 23(12):942-6. PubMed ID: 7885725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of grades 3 and 4 chondromalacia of the knee using T2*-weighted 3D gradient-echo articular cartilage imaging.
Murphy BJ
Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Jun; 30(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 11465769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of patellar cartilage in cadavers with a low-field-strength extremity-only magnet: comparison of MR imaging sequences, with macroscopic findings as the standard.
Ahn JM; Kwak SM; Kang HS; Muhle C; Pedowitz RA; Frank LR; Trudell D; Haghighi P; Resnick D
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 9646793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the chondromalacia patella using a microscopy coil: comparison of the two-dimensional fast spin echo techniques and the three-dimensional fast field echo techniques.
Kim HJ; Lee SH; Kang CH; Ryu JA; Shin MJ; Cho KJ; Cho WS
Korean J Radiol; 2011; 12(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 21228943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR arthrography in chondromalacia patellae diagnosis on a low-field open magnet system.
Harman M; Ipeksoy U; Dogan A; Arslan H; Etlik O
Clin Imaging; 2003; 27(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 12727059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chondromalacia patellae: fat-suppressed MR imaging.
Rose PM; Demlow TA; Szumowski J; Quinn SF
Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):437-40. PubMed ID: 7972759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC.
Macarini L; Perrone A; Murrone M; Marini S; Stefanelli M
Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thickness of patellofemoral articular cartilage as measured on MR imaging: sequence comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation.
van Leersum MD; Schweitzer ME; Gannon F; Vinitski S; Finkel G; Mitchell DG
Skeletal Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 7481900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of patellar cartilage. Comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers.
Rand T; Brossmann J; Pedowitz R; Ahn JM; Haghigi P; Resnick D
Acta Radiol; 2000 Sep; 41(5):492-7. PubMed ID: 11016774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of chondromalacia of the patella with axial inversion recovery-fast spin-echo imaging.
Lee SH; Suh JS; Cho J; Kim SJ; Kim SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Mar; 13(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 11241815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
