These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8958622)

  • 1. MR imaging of articular cartilage in the ankle: comparison of available imaging sequences and methods of measurement in cadavers.
    Tan TC; Wilcox DM; Frank L; Shih C; Trudell DJ; Sartoris DJ; Resnick D
    Skeletal Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(8):749-55. PubMed ID: 8958622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging.
    El-Khoury GY; Alliman KJ; Lundberg HJ; Rudert MJ; Brown TD; Saltzman CL
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):768-73. PubMed ID: 15516604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation.
    Peterfy CG; van Dijke CF; Janzen DL; Glüer CC; Namba R; Majumdar S; Lang P; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 8029420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.
    Kornaat PR; Reeder SB; Koo S; Brittain JH; Yu H; Andriacchi TP; Gold GE
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Apr; 13(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15780647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
    Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
    Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
    Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
    Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
    Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of patellar cartilage. Comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers.
    Rand T; Brossmann J; Pedowitz R; Ahn JM; Haghigi P; Resnick D
    Acta Radiol; 2000 Sep; 41(5):492-7. PubMed ID: 11016774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: evaluation of two- and three-dimensional sequences.
    Tervonen O; Dietz MJ; Carmichael SW; Ehman RL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 8347961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist--comparison of high resolution pulse sequences and different fat signal suppression techniques in cadavers].
    Stäbler A; Spieker A; Bonel H; Schrank C; Glaser C; Petsch R; Putz R; Reiser M
    Rofo; 2000 Feb; 172(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 10723491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging.
    Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with three-dimensional MR imaging.
    Dupuy DE; Spillane RM; Rosol MS; Rosenthal DI; Palmer WE; Burke DW; Rosenberg AE
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):919-24. PubMed ID: 8959181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Magnetic resonance study of patellofemoral cartilage with a fat-suppressed T1-3D gradient-echo sequence: a comparison with other acquisition technics at medium field strength].
    Cardone G; Minio Paluello GB; Lo Presti G; Gagliardo O; Gallucci M; Castrucci M
    Radiol Med; 1997 Sep; 94(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 9446117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3.0T MR imaging of the ankle: Axial traction for morphological cartilage evaluation, quantitative T2 mapping and cartilage diffusion imaging-A preliminary study.
    Jungmann PM; Baum T; Schaeffeler C; Sauerschnig M; Brucker PU; Mann A; Ganter C; Bieri O; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K; Bauer JS
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1546-1554. PubMed ID: 26003193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative and topographical evaluation of ankle articular cartilage using high resolution MRI.
    Millington SA; Li B; Tang J; Trattnig S; Crandall JR; Hurwitz SR; Acton ST
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 17019682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.